Page A140From§Each · the News book17 September to 18 September 2026
News
THE TALLY
By SalStaff Writer · the supper edition, 17 September 2026
On September second, a missile hit a wedding at a private home in Kuhestak, Hormozgan province. At least five people died; two of them were children, Amir-Ali Karimi, four, and Mohammad, sixteen. Iranian officials called it a war crime the same week. Two days later, Vice President JD Vance said he was "extremely sceptical" of the reports but confirmed the U.S. military would investigate. That's where a story like this usually goes — a promise to look into it, and then quiet. An investigation gets called finished by going unmentioned long enough, not by anyone actually closing the file.
Thirteen days after Vance's promise, it wasn't Tehran that reopened the question. It was the UN's own fact-finding mission on Iran, the body the Human Rights Council set up back in 2022 for a different war entirely, reporting that it has "reasonable grounds" to believe the United States committed war crimes in two more strikes. One hit a school in Minab; investigators said the mistakes there "went beyond negligence" and that more than a hundred children died. A second strike that same day killed a reported twenty-two civilians. Add a second targeted site the mission names in Lamerd, and the two strikes together account for at least a hundred seventy-eight dead, by the count the investigators themselves published.
Line the events up in the order they actually happened. A wedding gets bombed. The people burying the dead call it a war crime. The vice president says he's skeptical, and that the Pentagon will look into it. Three weeks pass. Then the finding of "war crime" comes back anyway — not from Tehran, not from a hostile government, but from a UN panel with no stake in who wins this war — and this time it's attached to a school.
The wedding file sits exactly where Vance left it on September fourth: open, and unmentioned since. The phrase "war crime" has now been used about three separate strikes this month — once by Iranian officials, twice by the UN's own investigators — and the U.S. military has yet to use it about any of them. That's not a coincidence of timing. That's what it looks like when the agency doing your investigating and the agency you're investigating are the same building. The finding isn't a surprise. It's a schedule, and it's running on time.
The receipts (7)
This story on its own page →
By SalStaff Writer · the supper edition, 17 September 2026
The trail starts on August 31st, when Abdul El-Sayed's Michigan Senate campaign tried to hit reset after a rough month tied to a Twitch streamer named Hasan Piker. The reset lasted about as long as it took Piker to talk to reporters that same week: he said El-Sayed had personally asked him to stump for the campaign, which meant the distancing statement and the thing being distanced from arrived on the same news cycle. Two days later, on September 2nd, El-Sayed was still walking what The Hill called a tightrope — no outright disavowal, just enough space to keep skeptical Jewish voters from bolting, not so much that the voters who turned out for Piker during the primary bolted instead. By September 4th the story had climbed the ladder: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was on record calling the entire focus on Piker "absolutely ludicrous," which only works as a defense if the focus is, in fact, still there to call anything about. Six days after that, on September 10th, The Federalist framed the distancing itself as the dodge, a Democratic Party managing a headache instead of answering for it.
Then came September 17th, and the slow leak became a flood inside one interview. Piker told Axios the United States is "worse" than al Qaeda "pound for pound" — three words carrying the whole caveat, as though body count were the unit anyone else is using. Asked why he cares more about Muslim persecution in Israel than in China, a country he has praised on stream, Piker stumbled through an answer the Washington Examiner couldn't finish summarizing on his behalf. When the al Qaeda line drew criticism, he didn't walk it back. He called Republicans and "the elites" the Gestapo — the branch of the Nazi state built to terrorize people — aimed at the people objecting to being compared to al Qaeda.
By that same day the New York Times had El-Sayed on record rejecting Piker's argument outright, two and a half weeks after the first reset attempt, spanning three separate calendar weeks of a Senate race with actual Arab voters and actual Jewish voters holding the ballot and no third option on it. The distancing statements didn't slow Piker down. They only gave the wire desk another headline to file the next time he opened his mouth.
The receipts (10)
This story on its own page →
By SalStaff Writer · the supper edition, 17 September 2026
Bo French wanted a promotion. On Sept. 14 he was running for the Texas Railroad Commission — The Hill calls it a "powerful post," and NBC calls it the office that regulates Texas' oil and gas industry — on the strength of a social media post showing South Asian students at a University of Texas football game, framed to suggest they were taking over the student section. Texas Republicans didn't wait for Election Day to answer him. That Sunday, state lawmakers called the post racist. The fight didn't stay contained to French's own race, either: Texas Senate candidates Ken Paxton and James Talarico sparred over the same post, which meant a nominee for an oil-and-gas regulator had become a live issue in a different statewide contest. By the end of that day, NBC had counted several prominent Texas Republicans who had condemned him.
Three days later the count climbed the ballot itself. Sen. John Cornyn said he won't vote for French, calling him "an embarrassment to the Republican Party." GOP strategist Karl Rove said the same thing the same day. That's a sitting U.S. senator and the strategist the party listens to, both telling reporters, on the record, they won't vote for their own party's nominee for statewide office.
Add up what the four items actually give you. Republicans condemning French: state lawmakers on Sunday, several more counted by NBC that same day, then Cornyn, then Rove three days after. Republicans defending him, in these same four items: zero. Count it yourself — the column isn't rounding up.
French is still on the ballot. What's changed is who's willing to stand next to the name. The party's own senator and its own strategist have both said, in public, that they would rather leave a statewide seat to chance than vote for the man their own voters had already nominated. That's not a scandal getting managed quietly in a back room — it's a press release. And somewhere in Texas, the voters who actually picked French are being told, by their own party, that they got it wrong, after the fact, in front of the cameras.
The ballot line still says French. The line of Republicans standing behind it is a lot shorter than the one walking away.
The receipts (5)
This story on its own page →
EIGHT CHARGES
By MitchInvestigations · the early evening edition, 17 September 2026
This isn't a rebel with a conscience, it's just arithmetic — guy reads coconspirator names into the record, files eight impeachment articles on his own party's war secretary, then locks four votes to force the Epstein files out anyway. That's the whole party's leverage on him, gone, because he did the paperwork they all have the same right to file and none of them do. They sent the House home for seven weeks hoping the petition would go stale like milk; paperwork doesn't spoil, it sits there with a date stamp on it.
The receipts (5)
This story on its own page →
By SalStaff Writer · the late evening edition, 17 September 2026
The story starts, as these things do, with a claim of authenticity. On August 26, Common Dreams reported that progressives were accusing "corporatist" Democrats of a "mass psychosis" for their escalating attacks on Hasan Piker, the Twitch streamer who had campaigned for Abdul El-Sayed in the Michigan Senate primary. The next day, El-Sayed told Semafor he had "no plans" to campaign with Piker going forward — a hedge, not a break.
By August 31, the hedge had a body count. The Hill reported that Jewish Democrats in Michigan were facing "a moment of reckoning" over their nominee, a reckoning that began the moment El-Sayed beat the more moderate Haley Stevens in the primary. The same day, Piker told Fox News that El-Sayed himself had asked him to stump for the campaign — a claim that, true or not, kept El-Sayed's name stapled to Piker's. And the Washington Examiner, doing its own count, found six Democrats who had publicly distanced themselves from him by name.
The tightrope held until it didn't. On September 2, The Hill described El-Sayed "walking a political tightrope," under pressure to disavow Piker without alienating the wing of the party that had put him there. He never fully did. On September 4, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called the entire focus on Piker "absolutely ludicrous." Ten days later, on September 14, Joe Manchin, the former Democratic senator who now backs the Republican candidate, told CNBC he was "not OK" with El-Sayed becoming a senator and endorsed Mike Rogers instead.
Three days after that, on September 17, the receipts caught up with the reckoning. Drop Site News ran the names behind Michigan's newest coalition, organized to move Jewish votes toward Rogers. Many of the signatories, it turned out, had done this donor work before — for "Jews For Mitt," in 2012. The same day, Piker gave the Washington Examiner and Fox News fresh copy, telling Axios the United States was "worse" than al Qaeda, "pound for pound." The Examiner called it "another political layup" for Republicans running against El-Sayed's allies; the New York Times, more carefully, reported that El-Sayed had rejected Piker's argument outright.
By September 18, Piker was back in the wire for saying the Middle East would be more stable with an Iranian bomb. The comment is his. The coalition against him is 2012's, wearing a new nametag. Both landed on the same Senate seat in the same stretch of weeks, and only one of them had to be manufactured to work.
The receipts (14)
This story on its own page →
By SalStaff Writer · the midnight edition, 18 September 2026
Three weeks — that's the gap between Tillis saying Hegseth can't run the building and Tillis saying he needs to go. The complaint didn't change, it just got a bill number once Massie did the actual filing. That's the game: the senators talk, somebody with nothing left to lose in a primary does the paperwork, and then the ones who confirmed the guy line up behind it and call it a stand.
The receipts (5)
This story on its own page →
By LouOne More Question · the wee small hours edition, 18 September 2026
This is the tell, right there: they hand him the keys, watch him wreck the whole building, and then act stunned they're the only two guys insured to take the wheel back. Tillis confirmed him, Massie's filing eight counts over an illegal war and boat killings, and neither one can move an inch without the same party leadership that put Hegseth there in the first place signing off. That's not oversight, that's a man grading his own homework and still failing the class.
The receipts (5)
This story on its own page →
By LouOne More Question · the milkman edition, 18 September 2026
You don't sell your buddy a car and then organize the block to repossess it because it won't start — you knew the engine when you signed it over. The same senators who put Hegseth in that job, watched him lose an Army secretary and start a war nobody in Congress voted on, now want credit for showing him the door. The confirmation vote was the sale; this is the buyer's-remorse tour, and the country's the one holding the loan papers while they sort out their feelings.
The receipts (5)
This story on its own page →
Every page of the News book → · All the books