News

Cornell bans frat parties, adds investigators, then faces a no-confidence vote over the same case.

By MitchInvestigations · the afternoon edition, 15 October 2026

On October 3, Cornell's own campus police logged a drug arrest at a fraternity house twenty-two hours before a former student says she was drugged and raped in that same house. On October 6, Cornell's trustees named Sally Yates, once the Justice Department's second-ranking official, to review how the university handles sexual misconduct complaints.

Wednesday, the venue changed again. Cornell's faculty senate convened, NBC News reports, to discuss whether it still has confidence in President Michael Kotlikoff over his handling of the alleged 2024 assault. All together now: the senate asked the questions, and Kotlikoff answered them — a defense of his own response, ABC reports, not an account of the allegation itself. NBC obtained audio of the exchange. CBS obtained video of it. The university's press office appears in neither byline.

Scrutiny. Sharp questions. A faculty senate — the body with the least formal power on most campuses — produced the two recordings that made it to television this week.

Students didn't wait for the senate to finish before grading the university's other move. Cornell had already announced a ban on fraternity parties and a handful of added investigators. Students for a Democratic Cornell told Truthout that wasn't enough: "Nowhere among these measures is the institutional change that students demand." All together now: the party ban is not the policy. The added investigators are not the inquiry. The outside reviewer named October 6 is not the prosecutor. Three nouns, stacked to resemble one verb — accountability — with no name yet attached to any finding.

The same week, five hundred miles west, the University of Chicago confirmed an almost identical allegation at one of its own fraternity houses. Chicago police named a person of interest. They do not have a suspect in custody; he fled the scene.

Two universities, two fraternity houses, one semester, and so far the same four moves at both campuses: a statement, a restriction, a reviewer, a recording somebody else made public. The question the lawsuits actually ask — who did this, and who answers for it — sits where Tompkins County's district attorney left it in September, when he declined to charge the seven men the 2024 complaint names. It is now Cornell's faculty senate asking that question out loud, on a recording obtained by two networks this week.

This story on its own page →

White House spokeswoman defends calling herself a lawyer she failed to become.

By ChipStaff Writer · the evening edition, 16 October 2026

Give the administration credit for speed. On October 9th, the president picked Katie Zacharia — a conservative commentator and communications adviser to his own media company — to replace Karoline Leavitt, who left the podium in August after having her second child. He called her a "devoted fan." Call it the fastest promotion in that building: a boss rewarding loyalty with the keys to the briefing room.

Four days later, on October 13th, she used them. Her first briefing ran under fifteen minutes — three questions, all from Fox News, the Daily Mail and Breitbart, and then it ended. Call the brevity discipline, fewer words and fewer chances to misspeak — watching her halt her way through her own prepared remarks, struggling just to get through the page, it wasn't discipline at all.

"When I moved to China," she said — an unusual credential for a White House spokeswoman, but loyalty counts for more than paperwork in this building. Nobody asked what happened after the move. Keeping options open.

That same Thursday, talking to the commentator Jack Posobiec, she supplied what China had left out: she had failed the bar exam in California before she ever got there. She still calls herself a lawyer anyway. "I was very careful," she said, about the wording — careful, it turns out, is the word for choosing "lawyer" when the truth is she never passed the exam that makes one.

By the time she sat down with Sean Hannity on Fox News, she was defending both things in the same breath — the brevity of the briefing and the credential she does not hold — as though either still needed defending. The job was supposed to be about how often she faces the press. It has become about whether there is still a podium worth facing, now that nobody at it had to pass anything to stand there.

This story on its own page →

Federal officials disband election-threat unit, then investigate powdery letters sent to election offices

By LouOne More Question · the evening edition, 16 October 2026

There's a sentence in this report I'd like to say something nice about, if I can get there without tripping over the next one. The Guardian published it October 1st. It says, in plain language, that the current administration has abandoned key security bodies meant to investigate direct threats to U.S. elections from foreign actors and domestic terrorists. That's a complete sentence. Subject, verb, object, no hedging. You don't see government writing that clean very often, and I mean that the way it sounds.

Here's the number that gets in the way of admiring it any further: zero. "Abandoned" is the word on the page, past tense, no asterisk next to it, but past tense covering what exactly? I read it twice to make sure I hadn't skimmed past a date and just missed it. I hadn't.

I've got a lock on my garage somebody installed for free a few years back, after a run of break-ins down the block. Lock goes in, the trouble stops, and after a while you forget there was ever a reason for it — it's just there, doing a job you don't think about, until the morning you notice it's gone and you can't put your finger on when it left. Was it there in June? You'd have to ask whoever took it off, and they're not the one who tells you.

What I can tell you is what moved into that space. One day after the report ran — October 2nd — Georgia's State Election Board, Republican-led, sent a letter to the Justice Department. What did it ask for? An investigation into the state's voting systems, additional security measures, a little over a month before the midterms. So the machines got a federal ask, in writing, with a date attached to it.

Two weeks after the report ran, three wire services had something new on the desk. The Guardian's version is specific: Louisiana and Oklahoma received envelopes with a powdery substance and evacuated their offices; a similar package addressed to the Ohio secretary of state was intercepted by the Postal Service before anyone opened it. The BBC confirms all three states by name — Louisiana, Oklahoma, Ohio. CBS's item is shorter: state election officials and congressional offices, unknown substances, and it doesn't name a single state. Three wire services on the same week's story. Two of them name the same three states. One of them, asked to say where, doesn't.

The FBI and the Postal Inspection Service are on the letters now, which is the right agency doing the right job, same as it would be whether or not a different body had stopped doing a related job sometime earlier this year. I'm not going to tell you those two facts are connected, because I don't have a date that lines them up, and neither, as far as I can find, does the report.

Oh — and before I let you go. That sentence I liked so much, the one with the clean subject and the clean verb? Go back and read it one more time. It doesn't say "bodies were allowed to lapse." It doesn't say "oversight lapsed." It names who did it: the administration. Not a passive sentence hiding the actor behind a semicolon — an actor, doing a verb, to an object that used to watch the mail for exactly this. The report already told you who closed it. I just think a sentence that clean is worth reading twice before you fold the page.

This story on its own page →

Trump calls Ukraine's strikes on the Russian refineries he just legalized buying from "a disgrace."

By The LodgersThe Euro Desk · the evening edition, 16 October 2026

Today we are making an energy ceasefire, not a dish you get over here, so I shall go slowly. You will need two countries that agreed to nothing, an American president who announced it for them anyway, and a word only one side at this table has used.

On 9 October Washington signed with Moscow to bring Russian diesel into American pumps; the sanctions that kept it out came off to make room. That took one signature, nothing more — pick it up, turn it over, it's still an oil deal. A week later a ceasefire on the refineries was added on top, and neither side said it had agreed to it.

CLIVE: A word only one side uses. I've called the thing in the shed a masterpiece since March; no one else will say it.

On 10 October, ink still wet, the president said it was time for Ukraine to get a new president. The same day Russia struck Ukraine, which Zelenskyy called "thanks" for the diesel deal; he said the money from it would intensify the war, and accused Washington of helping fund it.

GARY: Masterpiece. Our boiler's said nothing since March and I'd trust it over the shed.

By 12 October Kyiv's allies, inside the president's circle, were rallying behind Zelenskyy against the deal and threats to cut off weapons and intelligence. Zelenskyy called the president "weak" for dealing with Russia.

KEITH: Weak sells. I could stitch it on something by Thursday — same as nearly happened to your boiler.

By 16 October the ceasefire was finished. Ukraine resumed its strikes on the Russian refineries after Zelenskyy said Moscow was not observing the truce, and the president called the renewed strikes "a disgrace," calling Zelenskyy "more difficult to deal with than Putin."

On Newsmax, host Rob Finnerty asked him; he said: "I'm not a big fan of Zelensky. They've destroyed that country." The New York Times called it a deal inflaming the war it was meant to end.

ROB: Destroyed. Always going to end like this — same as your boiler scheme, Keith; nobody's thanked me for the damp.

Here is the mishap: before any of this, pro-Russian accounts claimed a Russian tanker was already carrying diesel to American shores under the new deal. France 24 checked; it was carrying fertiliser.

CLIVE: Carrying it this far — that's a stanza, Rob. Finished by Friday, shed permitting.

The Guardian, what they have here, prints it as the "energy ceasefire" — its own quotation marks — and says neither Russia nor Ukraine agreed to it. The New York Times at home drops the quotes and calls it simply a deal.

You will be looking for the two signatures that make a ceasefire a ceasefire. There are none; the quotation marks are standing in for them.

This serves the Russian refiners, paid in dollars now the sanctions are off. Ukraine pays in allies, rallying Europe's since Washington stopped being reliable.

ROB: Allies. Four of us in this house and none's paid the gas since March; the Europeans still answer the phone.

This story on its own page →

Protester interrupts Maine Senate debate about data centers; debate about data centers interrupted by jokes about the protester

By The Wrecking CrewThe Remedy Desk · the evening edition, 16 October 2026

THE WRECKING CREW kept the blueprints from last week's job open on the bench. The chief ran the inventory out loud, because the job kept growing drawers. On September 25, Palm Beach County's commission reached into its own code and pulled out permitting authority that had been sitting there the whole time: a 6-0 vote, a one-year moratorium on any data center over 50 megawatts. Memphis had already used a different tool from a different drawer, a zoning fight paired with a primary ballot, to slow down Elon Musk's xAI. Washington State had its own tool, a utility-siting statute that predates this entire fight by years, still sitting on the shelf, never retired. Then two more tools turned up on the bench: Ohio Senator Bernie Moreno's bill to tax local data-center subsidies at 100 percent, and Texas governor candidate Gina Hinojosa's promise of a moratorium of her own if she wins.

Thursday night the job moved to a stage in Maine. The planner stood back and admired how the pieces kept finding each other without anybody planning it: zoning board, primary ballot, utility statute, a tax bill in Congress, a campaign promise in Texas, and now a debate floor. A protester stood up shouting about AI data centers. Security moved to remove them. While they worked, Senator Susan Collins quipped: "So this is obviously one of Troy's supporters." Challenger Troy Jackson snapped back: "Oh, shut up."

The tinkerer looked at what was actually on the table once the noise cleared: no new law, no new statute, nothing built for the occasion. Just an old permitting code, an old zoning map, an old utility statute, a new federal tax bill, and a promise on a gubernatorial trail, all aimed at the same industry from five different directions.

The pilot is the one who gets a story like this to print, and tonight the only cargo worth carrying was the question nobody on that stage asked out loud: which drawer does Maine open next, the one Palm Beach already used, or one nobody's found yet. The tools are out of the box. The industry hasn't been stopped in Maine. It has been stopped in Memphis, Palm Beach County, and the state of Washington, by people who already had what they needed before anyone announced a plan.

This story on its own page →

U.S. cuts Cuba's fuel in January, runs a $100 million hearts-and-minds program there by September

By SterlingThe Ownership Desk · the morning edition, 16 October 2026

You will be told the embargo has failed. Sixty-seven years of it, and the government it was written against is still standing, so the thing is a ruin. Do not mistake me. Nothing here has broken. It was drafted to deny one island hard currency and fuel, and against that specification it performs ... quite exquisitely. Sixty-seven years. Sixty-seven.

In January the fuel shipments stopped. And what travels the other way? A hundred million dollars, Marco Rubio's programme, for hearts and minds on the island, reported the tenth of September. A hundred million for the hearts, and no fuel for the houses.

Forty-five groups wrote to Hakeem Jeffries on the ninth of September asking the House to vote on the war powers resolution covering the de facto oil embargo. The House has not voted. The caucus is divided over squeezing harder.

Carlos Fernández de Cossío says the aim is to "asphyxiate the people of Cuba into submission." The grid goes down and comes back and goes down. That is the instrument working.

This story on its own page →

Blair's rep says she did not intend to harm anyone; the charge sheet is up to three.

By MitchInvestigations · the afternoon edition, 16 October 2026

The first statement from Selma Blair's representatives arrived Friday, five days after a Delta flight from Los Angeles to Kennedy.

Sit with the verb. Intent is the element the statement contests, and it is the only element the statement contests. By Friday the week had already finished assembling the rest. The statement moves none of those three. It declines to engage with them at all, politely, in the passive register that publicists reserve for a count they cannot shrink.

Then there is the other document, the one argued in court on Tuesday. Her lawyer told the judge about a head injury and missed MS medication — a defense about a body, which is a serious thing and deserves a serious hearing. In the same breath, the same lawyers asked for leniency on the grounds that their client is "the gold standard." Two arguments in one room: one holding that a person was not in control of a body, the other that the person is the finest available example of one. By the Post's account of the hearing, the Queens judge was not persuaded.

Follow the last clause. The Fox version of Friday's statement includes the detail that authorities took her service dog. That is the single line in the whole release describing something done to her rather than something she did not mean, it is checkable, and if it happened it is worth a filing of its own. It arrives shoulder to shoulder with "much more to this story," the oldest sentence in the genre, and it is Friday evening, and the rest of the story is not attached.

What is supposed to happen when a passenger has a medical emergency in a sealed aluminum tube is treatment. Instead the record shows an arrest, a hospital, a second accusation at the hospital, and then, on day five, a sentence about what was in someone's mind. Note that the sentence is available at all. The other version gets a statement, a plea, and a memo calling the defendant a standard.

The statement names the dog. It does not name the three.

This story on its own page →

Federal officials dismantle election-threat unit, learn Republican offices are also on the mailing list

By LouOne More Question · the afternoon edition, 16 October 2026

I need a favor, and it's the kind of favor where I'm the one who doesn't know anything. There's a single word in a newspaper story I can't get to the bottom of, and the word is abandoned.

You people do this every day. You read these things for a living, you know which office does what. I've done it once, this week, in a notebook, with a pen I borrowed off the counter at the corner store and never gave back.

Hang on. It's in the coat, the coat's in the car, the car's the one with the fan belt — no, here, I dog-eared it. October 1st, the Guardian. I wrote the sentence down the way they printed it: the administration "has abandoned key security bodies meant to investigate direct threats to US elections by foreign actors and domestic terrorists." Former officials say so. A recent report says so. And the same story says officials have been actively focused on unsubstantiated claims of widespread voter fraud by noncitizens, while credible threats were overlooked. Overlooked is their word, not mine.

So here's the simple question, and I apologize for how simple it is: when a direct threat arrives, which office opens the envelope?

The day after that story — October 2nd, I had to flip back twice to find it — a Republican-led state election board in Georgia asked the administration to look into Georgia's voting systems. So somebody is looking into something. I wrote "fine" in the margin. I've since put a box around "fine."

Two weeks on, October 15th: the FBI and the Postal Service are investigating letters containing an unknown substance, mailed to election offices. Louisiana. Oklahoma. Ohio. Three states, and in each one a person who runs elections opening the mail at a desk.

Then CBS, this week: the letters went to state election officials and to congressional offices. Then Friday — that's today, I checked the date on my own notebook — NBC reports the investigation has widened, because some Republicans have been identified as targets of the mailings.

Now here's where I need the help, because I keep getting turned around, and I'll show you with the only thing I've got.

There's a toll plaza on my way in. Used to be a fellow in a booth. They took the booth out, put in the machine, and one morning last spring the machine took my dollar and the gate arm stayed down. Behind me, a line. On the barrier there's a sign with a number on it. I called the number from the shoulder, smoking a cigar I shouldn't have, and the recording told me to use the website, and the website told me to call the number. Fifteen minutes, and the honest answer to "who's supposed to help me" turned out to be: the sign. Now, the sign isn't lying to anybody. The sign's doing exactly what a sign does. It just doesn't open anything.

So that's my trouble. The bodies meant to investigate direct threats from domestic terrorists — the report says those were the bodies for this — and the thing that arrived is a letter with an unknown substance in it, mailed to an election office. If the investigating is being done, and the FBI and the Postal Service say it is, which desk is the sign?

Excuse me — sorry, that's my elbow on your door, I'll be out of your way. One more thing and I'll let you go. The report that used that word came out October 1st. The letters turned up October 15th. Fourteen days between them, and now the targets include members of the majority party, which is the reason the thing got bigger on a Friday. So when a congressman's office calls to ask who's handling it, they're calling the body in the Guardian's sentence. And the word in that sentence, the one I came in here about, the one I've got written down right here — abandoned.

This story on its own page →