Travel

Federal watchdog finds millions wasted on empty tents; a second finds cages smaller than phone booths.

By RuthThe Money Desk · the milkman edition, 25 September 2026

The Government Accountability Office filed its report on immigration detention this Thursday. Its finding: the Trump administration squandered millions of dollars expanding it. The specifics, as printed: unused tents. Uneaten food. The word the GAO settled on was waste.

Eleven days earlier, on September 14, a different watchdog put out a report on a facility inside the federal immigration detention system. The watchdog was the Department of Homeland Security's own inspector general. The facility was Alligator Alcatraz, in Florida, since closed. Its finding: cramped conditions, detainees at times held in small metal enclosures, cages the report measured at roughly the size of a phone booth.

Set the two reports side by side and this desk did the only thing a desk can do with two ledgers: add them up. One watchdog counted the tents that sat unused and the food that went uneaten. The other counted the square footage a detained person actually got. Nobody at either office says these two counts are the same count. They don't have to be. They are two federal audits, eleven days apart, filed against the same detention system, by watchdogs whose entire job is exactly this kind of arithmetic.

Here is what a gap looks like once you set it on paper, hon. One column of the ledger is a dollar figure: money spent on tents and food that sat unused. The other column is a measurement: the space a person held in detention actually got, and it comes in under the size of a phone booth. Neither column adjusted for the other. Both figures came out of the same eleven-day window in September. Neither report indicates the two offices were comparing notes.

That is the reconciliation, and it is a short one. Millions of dollars went to capacity nobody used, in the same stretch of time that a shuttered Florida facility was holding people in space the government's own inspector counted in phone-booth units. Both figures are public record. Both watchdogs work for the federal government. Both reports concern the same administration's system of immigration detention, filed eleven days apart, by two offices that do not answer to each other and did not need to compare notes to arrive at the same shape of finding: money with no people in it, and people with no room.

Neither report explains why the money and the room ended up on opposite ends of the same ledger. Counting is the watchdogs' job. Explaining is somebody else's, and so far nobody's taken it.

This story on its own page →

Government wastes millions building ICE jails it didn't check it needed, then cuts $810 million elsewhere for waste.

By RuthThe Money Desk · the early evening edition, 25 September 2026

The Government Accountability Office says Immigration and Customs Enforcement has poured billions into six detention-expansion initiatives since January 2025 without the planning to know whether any of it was needed, and that the rush produced millions of dollars in waste — money spent on facilities and services that were never used, were abandoned almost as fast as they opened, or cost far more than they should have. The agency did not run the numbers first; it built anyway.

Eleven days before the GAO published that finding, the Department of Homeland Security's own inspector general had already found what one of those rush jobs produced. At the Florida detention center known as "Alligator Alcatraz," the watchdog cited cramped conditions, describing "small metal enclosures." The facility has since closed. That is the case the GAO's number is describing: capacity expanded first, conditions checked after, if at all.

Then came the ledger entry the editor asked me to reconcile. The same week the audit ran, the White House canceled $810 million in congressionally appropriated funding — the second "pocket rescission" in 49 years — with large sums earmarked for programs serving illegal immigrants and race-focused initiatives among the targets.

Here is the reconciliation. The $810 million came out of programs that appear nowhere in the GAO's audit. The waste finding and the waste cut did not land on the same line item.

This is not the only accounting problem on the books this month. A Joint Economic Committee report put the taxpayer cost of the administration's other projects at $1.8 billion, ballroom renovations among them at $927 million. A separate plan to relocate roughly 18,000 white South African migrants carries a projected taxpayer cost of $500 million. Set those figures beside the $810 million rescinded from immigrant and race-focused programs and the shape of the ledger holds steady: the money that gets called waste and the money that gets called necessary keep landing in different columns, hon, and the column that gapped by millions this month is not the column that got smaller.

This story on its own page →

WASTED MILLIONS

The rush that built 'small metal enclosures' is the rush a watchdog now finds wasted millions.

By RuthThe Money Desk · the wee small hours edition, 26 September 2026

The Government Accountability Office did the counting. Since January 2025, ICE has poured billions of dollars into six separate detention-expansion initiatives, the GAO's audit found, without what the auditors call "the necessary analysis and planning" to know whether the spending was needed, affordable, or capable of meeting federal detention standards. The audit's own words for the result: "millions of dollars of waste."

Eleven days before that audit landed, on September 14, a different watchdog had already priced out one piece of the same rush. DHS's internal inspector general found that detainees at the Florida facility known as Alligator Alcatraz, now closed, were held in "cramped conditions," some in what the report called "small metal enclosures."

CBS News, summarizing the audit, called the spending an "unprecedented budget." The GAO's own language stayed narrower and colder: waste, poor planning, six initiatives launched without the analysis to justify any of them.

Run the other ledger from the same stretch. On September 3, independent analyst Charles Gaba published a count: up to 10 million people have lost health coverage since this term began. The next day, September 4, the arithmetic moved to the cafeteria: the 2025 budget law's cuts to SNAP — the largest cut to the program since its inception more than six decades ago — pushed enrollment to its lowest level in 17 years, putting roughly five million people, 1.5 million of them children, at risk of losing free school meals.

Put the two ledgers side by side, hon. Billions went into cells the government's own inspectors say were too small and too rushed to meet the government's own standards, with millions of that spending confirmed wasted. In the same stretch, up to 10 million people lost health coverage and roughly five million lost food assistance. Nothing here requires an adjective. The dates are eleven days apart on one ledger and the same term-long stretch on the other, filed by the government's own watchdogs and its own data. The gap is the story, and it is denominated in dollars either way.

This story on its own page →

FAA investigates 737 Max flight-guidance glitch, seven years after final report blamed its software for two fatal crashes.

By SalStaff Writer · the late evening edition, 26 September 2026

The Federal Aviation Administration said this week it is investigating a software glitch in some Boeing 737 Max jets that can make the automated flight-guidance system disengage during an aborted landing. The agency used the word "investigating." It has used that word on this jet before.

Seven years earlier, on March 12, 2019, the ground stopped moving under the plane. The European Union, Australia, India, Malaysia, Singapore, and Turkey grounded every 737 Max 8 in their fleets that morning; Indonesia and China had grounded theirs the day before. Between the two waves, 40 percent of the global 737 Max fleet was sitting on tarmacs. Boeing said a software update was coming within weeks.

The update did not stop the lawyers. Just over five months later, on August 27, 2019, Avia Capital Services — a Russian leasing firm with 35 Max jets on order — sued Boeing in an Illinois court, the first 737 Max customer to do it. Avia's lawyers argued Boeing had negligently designed the jet and made negligent representations to the same FAA now looking at a new glitch, and asked for damages and a canceled order.

Two months after that, on October 25, 2019, Indonesian investigators closed their case with a 353-page final report. It found the crash was caused by flawed software design from Boeing, a carrier that kept flying a jet it had reason to ground, and pilots handed an emergency the manual hadn't covered.

That is the file the FAA reopens this month. Not reopens, exactly — opens a new one, on a new symptom, in the same jet's automation, checked by the same agency that certified it the first time. The airplane is not new. The regulator is not new. The word is not new.

You don't get the 353 pages. You get a seat, an aborted landing you may never hear announced, and a manufacturer now investigated twice over automation in the same aircraft by the same agency. There is always room at the top for another production run. The bill for the fix has been due twice and paid neither time by the company that owes it.

This story on its own page →

Republicans cite 426 arrests to make crackdown permanent, then turn on the member who called it too far

By ChipStaff Writer · the sunrise edition, 27 September 2026

I'll take the four questions in order, because the sequence here is clean and it only gets excitable if you refuse to hold it straight.

Senator Banks has the number. Five days, 426 arrests, Indiana. That is the argument for writing the president's deportation agenda into permanent statute, and I'd ask the four of you to sit with the number before you reach for adjectives. Four hundred twenty-six. It proves — well, it demonstrates — look, the wire items on my desk do not give a breakdown of how many of the 426 had a criminal record, so what the number proves is that 426 arrests occurred, which is what the number has always proved, and we are comfortable resting a permanent statute on that.

Now, Representative Salazar. On the 17th she ran an advertisement saying the enforcement had gone too far, specifically as to people arrested without criminal records, and the Secretary answered it the following day. The president himself, on the 18th, told reporters he disagreed with her and supported her reelection regardless. That is a big tent. On the 20th she went on Face the Nation and said he had been very courteous, very receptive. That is a party processing a disagreement like adults, and I'd like that in the transcript.

Then Saturday the president amplified negative posts about her, which drew a rebuke from at least one Republican, and her race tightened this week. So the through-line is that support survived the ad right up until — no. Support survived the ad. Support did not survive the week the polling moved, which is a different sentence than the one I meant to give you, and I'd like the first one in the transcript instead.

Because here is what the room is missing. The real document is the Democrats' bill — Representative Ramirez's Reimagining Safety Act, which would abolish the agency outright.

I reject the framing. The record shows a party that tolerates dissent, welcomes it, boosts criticism of it, and finishes the sentence later. Did I say that? That doesn't sound like me.

This story on its own page →

Trump waves off Republican breaks with him; Cassidy, Cornyn and Massie were primaried out for theirs

By ChipStaff Writer · the breakfast edition, 27 September 2026

Before questions, the sequence, because the sequence is calm and only sounds loud if you rearrange it.

Four hundred twenty-six arrests in Indiana over five days. That is the operational basis for members pushing to write the president's deportation program into permanent statute. The number proves the program works — proves the program operated, which, fine, is what a count of arrests proves, and we are comfortable resting there.

Second. On September 17, Representative Salazar released an advertisement shot outside the White House saying the enforcement effort had gone too far. The response from this building was measured. Senator Mullin defended the president's policy the next day, the president himself stayed with her, and by the 20th the congresswoman reported that he had been receptive. Receptive. He listened. That is not the same as agreement, and I'd ask you not to write that it was, since I'm the one who just called it measured.

Third: on September 22 a nonpartisan race-rater moved that Miami seat from likely Republican to lean Republican. Note that the rating moved after the ad, not because of the ad. I can't source causation and neither can you, and I'll stop there before the four of us get interested in what the president noticed on the 22nd.

Which brings us to Saturday, when the president amplified negative commentary about the congresswoman, drawing a rebuke from at least one Republican. This is being characterized as a turn. It is not a turn. It is engagement with criticism, which he is entitled to, and — look, the operative point in today's reporting is that he is not bothered by Republican breaks generally. He has declined to go after most of them. He has ousted three: he endorsed primary challenges against Senator Cassidy, Senator Cornyn and Representative Massie over insufficient loyalty, and all three are gone. That is a record, not a warning. A record is a warning with dates on it. Strike that.

Last. Democrats have introduced a bill to abolish the agency that ran the Indiana operation, and our editorial page has already laid out what abolishing it looks like. So the choice on the floor is the permanent version or nothing, and the members who have to cast that vote have now watched, over ten days, what happens to a colleague who asks whether 426 is a number or an argument. It is not a complicated lesson. It was not meant to be.

I'm told that last part landed like a threat. It was a schedule. Next question.

This story on its own page →

Republicans brand Muslim Democrats 'chief enemies,' then defend their own confused ICE memo instead.

By ChipStaff Writer · the noon edition, 27 September 2026

The instruction went out this week in one sentence: anyone in the country illegally remains "on the table" for arrest and deportation. It was needed because internal ICE guidance on who still qualifies for arrest had caused confusion, and that confusion reached agents themselves, enough to spark alarm. The clarifying statement did not describe a policy. It described a walk-back of a memo the agency itself could not read straight.

That would be manageable enough if it were the only thing battleground Republicans had to defend this week. It is not. Two weeks earlier, at the party's first-ever midterm convention in Dallas, the message discipline ran the other direction. Party officials built the pitch out from there: cast Muslim Democrats — New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani and a Michigan Senate candidate — as the "chief enemies" of the midterm cycle. That was the script. Attack the outsider, run the base home.

The script assumed the enemy would stay where the podium put them. Instead, the same week Republicans in Kansas, Texas and Florida are on the ballot, they are being asked not about the Muslim Democrats named in Dallas but about ICE — the raids, the confusion inside the agency's own guidance, the statement the White House had to issue to explain what the statement before it meant. The convention wrote the ad. The agency wrote the rebuttal, and the candidates are stuck reading both out loud on the same doorstep.

Defend the policy, then: the guidance was clear, the correction was routine, agents were never actually alarmed — agents were alarmed, alarmed enough that it made the wire under the president's own name reaffirming it. The clarification exists because the original guidance did not hold on its own. That is not a talking point running smoothly. That is a podium fixing what a memo broke, in public, in the same week the candidates are on the ballot.

So battleground Republicans in Kansas, Texas and Florida are carrying two lines into these final weeks, not one. The first is the "chief enemies" script the convention wrote for them in Dallas, built around Muslim Democrats they now have to defend attacking, to actual voters, not a hall of delegates. The second is an ICE arrest memo confusing enough that the agency needed the president to reissue it in his own voice. The podium did not get to choose which fire the candidates would carry into the midterms. Both showed up the same week.

This story on its own page →

Republicans told to blame 'chief enemies' Muslim Democrats, assigned instead to defend ICE's own confused arrest memo

By ChipStaff Writer · the matinee edition, 27 September 2026

Start with the discipline, because there was plenty of it. On 30 August, the administration sanctioned the Italy-based Autistici Inventati Collective as a "Specially Designated Global Terrorist," wire coverage describing it as a leftist network that had operated in plain sight for years — the kind of enforcement a serious administration can point to without flinching. Whether that arrest count is the same claim as the "over 2,000" deportations running beside it in the same release is a separate question, and the release does not settle it.

Three days after that, the convention's pitch had its headline: Republicans cast Muslim Democrats as the party's "chief enemies," a midterm framing built to give candidates something to run on besides the raids themselves. Candidates would talk about chief enemies. They would not need to talk about ICE.

Then came this week's correction, and it is nothing more than that: a clarification — call it a walk-back, if you want the plainer word for it — of internal ICE guidance so confusing it reached the agents doing the arresting and left them alarmed. The instruction, once fixed, reads simply enough: anyone in the country illegally remains "on the table" for arrest and deportation. That is policy working as intended. That is also, if the sequence gets told straight, an agency correcting a memo it wrote and could not itself read the same way twice — in public, mid-crackdown, the same week its own agents needed the fix explained to them.

It lands on a bad week to need explaining. Battleground Republicans in Kansas, Texas and Florida are fielding questions about the raids directly, on their own account, not about chief enemies — which means the convention's script did not survive contact with the midterms it was written for. The sanctioned server was real. The arrest count was real. The confusion agents raised alarm over was real too, and candidates this week are stuck defending that instead of the script they were handed.

Candidates this week are defending one word from that memo, on its own, with no chief enemies standing in front of it. The word is anyone.

This story on its own page →