News

test

By SalStaff Writer · the early evening edition, 9 September 2026

test

This story on its own page →

Hours after the Supreme Court declines to save Missouri's blocked map, a federal judge orders it used anyway.

By LouOne More Question · the early evening edition, 9 September 2026

I went to the license bureau Tuesday because the sticker on my plate said I owed the state forty dollars I did not have that morning, and the clerk at window three took one look at my renewal and told me I wanted window one, and the woman at window one told me I wanted the annex on the other side of the parking lot, and that is how a man loses a morning trying to keep a piece of metal legal.

The annex had a television bolted to the wall above the folding chairs, tuned low, and while I waited for a number that never seemed to come up, it was reporting that Missouri's Supreme Court had thrown out the new congressional map — unanimously — and ruled that voters would have to approve it first before it could ever be used, so the state would go back to its old map for now. How many of Missouri's Supreme Court justices voted against that?

They sent me from the annex to a satellite office downtown, because it turns out the annex doesn't handle whatever category my renewal falls under, and at the satellite office there was a radio on the counter, and the man ahead of me in line was talking with the clerk about how the state had gone over that court's head two days later and asked the Supreme Court of the United States to overturn the block — an emergency filing, the Attorney General's office calling what the state court had done a "federal-election-administration disaster." Is a "federal-election-administration disaster" the same map a federal judge would order into use a few days after that filing?

From there they sent me to the courthouse basement, for reasons I no longer remember, and the deputy at the metal detector had it on his phone: the Supreme Court had rebuffed the state's request, left the block standing, declined to get involved at all. That was the morning's news. By that afternoon, a federal judge had ordered Missouri to use the new map anyway — the one the state court had blocked, the one the U.S. Supreme Court had just refused to save — for November. Same map. Same week. Was it days between those two rulings, or was it hours?

On the way between all these buildings there's a toll plaza, and my car doesn't love hills, so I was already easing off the gas when the arm went up for me, green light, go ahead — and then it came back down before I'd cleared it, and I sat there with a truck behind me leaning on his horn, trying to decide what a person is supposed to do with a gate like that. Up, then down. Same gate, same car, same ten seconds. Do you back up, or do you go through?

The last stop was the actual courthouse window everyone had been sending me toward all day, and the clerk there mentioned a separate matter — the state's own Supreme Court weighing whether to hold the state's top election official in contempt, and an appeals panel that had already refused to halt the federal order from taking effect. Is a court that is weighing contempt against the state's top election official the same court whose own ruling a federal judge just told them to set aside?

I finally had my renewal in hand when the woman behind the glass said, oh — before you go — one more thing. Which district did she want me registered under? The one the state's court had blocked, or the one the federal judge had just ordered used? I did not know. Do you?

This story on its own page →

Trump says midterms will end the Iran war, months after his White House swore they wouldn't touch it.

By LouOne More Question · the early evening edition, 9 September 2026

I went to the Selective Service board on Tuesday because my grandson turns eighteen in March, and I wanted to know, plain and simple, whether there's a card he ought to be carrying that he isn't. Wrong room. The young man behind the glass told me registration's handled through the post office now, third window from the end, and he said it apologetic, like he'd told this to somebody else that morning too.

Post office annex. There's a television bolted up in the corner by the stamp machine, and it was running the noon news while I waited in line behind two people mailing packages. The anchor said the President had told reporters, this same week, that he thinks the Iran war will end "immediately after" the midterm elections. I wrote that down on the back of an envelope because I didn't have anything else to write it on. The clerk, when I got to her, said registration's a federal database thing, she just weighs boxes, but the VFW hall on Route 9 keeps an old roster and might point me somewhere useful.

VFW hall. The only person in the building was a man refilling a coffee urn, and he said the roster hadn't been kept since the nineties, but there was a radio going on the folding table behind him, and the man on it was reading off a report that Iran had used something called an electro-optical missile for the first time, aimed at a U.S. warship, and that analysts had found construction speeding up at an underground nuclear site the Iranians call Pickaxe Mountain — the same site, the radio said, the administration's been talking about striking. The coffee man said try the district office, they handle veterans' affairs and might know who handles the rest.

District office. Closed early — a sign taped to the glass said back at one, but somebody had also taped a printed statement to the door, dated the second of September, where the White House said flat out that the coming midterms would not alter the timeline for the war in Iran. I stood there and read it twice, because I'd just written down, an hour before, that the same White House now says the war ends right after those same midterms. That's two buildings and two different answers about the same clock, and I hadn't asked either building anything about a clock. I'd asked about my grandson.

Fifth stop — a liaison desk at the strip mall past the tire place, the kind of office that shares a parking lot with a nail salon. The woman there was kind about it, said Selective Service compliance for eighteen-year-olds isn't something her office tracks either, tried the number for me anyway, got a recording. That's five buildings, if you're counting, and not one of them had anything to do with my grandson.

She was walking me to the door when she mentioned, like it was nothing, that the Navy had struck three Iranian oil tankers the Saturday before, after Iran fired on an aircraft carrier and a destroyer, and that Iran had answered by declaring, the day after, some kind of exclusion zone around the strait the oil moves through. All of that — the tankers, the missile, the exclusion zone — happened in the seven days between the White House swearing the midterms wouldn't move the war and the President saying the midterms would end it.

So here's what I've got, and maybe you can tell me, because five buildings couldn't: if the war's timeline was fixed on the second of September, untouched by any election, what moved between then and the ninth to make the election the whole timeline?

This story on its own page →

THE COUNT

Democrats denounce socialism on House floor, nominate a socialist for Providence mayor days later

By LouOne More Question · the late evening edition, 9 September 2026

I went down to the annex about a parking ticket. Not politics — a parking ticket, the one from June, the meter on Weybosset that eats quarters and gives you back nothing. Wrong room, of course. The clerk at Window 4 looked at my paper, said this is a state matter now, try the House side, second floor, ask for Records.

So I went up. Records sent me to Committee, Committee sent me to the gallery, and that's where I was standing when somebody handed me a printed sheet — I hadn't asked for it, it just came my way, same as things do when you're in the wrong room long enough. The sheet said House Resolution, 220 to 192, Tuesday, September 1st. Eight Democrats voted with the Republicans on that one — I wrote the number on the back of my ticket, since I hardly ever have the notebook when I need it — to denounce socialism, all its forms, and something called the DSA by name.

I asked the man next to me what the DSA was. He said ask downstairs. So I went downstairs.

Downstairs was Elections. Not what I'd come for either, but I was already off my errand, so I stood in a line like the one at the RMV for plates, the kind where you take a number and read the walls. On the wall was a notice, Tuesday too, but the next one, September 8th. Providence primary. A state lawmaker named David Morales beat the sitting mayor by fourteen points — that's the number DDHQ gave, and I copied it same as the other, ticket, sheet, wall notice, three scraps in one coat pocket now, and my raincoat only has the one pocket that zips. Democratic socialist, the paper called him, same three letters as the ones from upstairs.

Same wall, same day, same primary — the governor lost too. Dan McKee, sitting governor, beat by a woman who used to run CVS, sixty-two and a half to thirty-seven and a half, four fifths of the votes counted when they called it. The clerk at that window said McKee hadn't lost a primary like that since — she looked it up — 2014, and that's for any elected governor anywhere, not just Rhode Island. I asked what that meant. She said she couldn't say, only 2014.

I have a car that starts on the third try most mornings and not at all on the fourth. I mention it because on the way to that parking ticket — never did settle it — I sat at the toll plaza a good while, thinking about the two scraps of paper now riding in the raincoat pocket next to the summons. Eight members upstairs vote to read socialism out of the party on a Tuesday. Seven days later, on the next Tuesday, the party's own voters in one state hand the socialist line a fourteen-point win in the capital and the sitting governor a walking paper of his own. Both things happened. Both are on paper I'm holding.

I don't know what the eight were counting on. I don't know what the fourteen points were answering. I only know the dates are seven days apart, one week, the kind of arithmetic even I can do at a toll booth.

The governor's name turned up on a different scrap too — something about a bridge crisis he hadn't sorted out — but that one didn't come from the toll plaza.

I was almost back at my car when the Records man came out of the annex behind me and said, hold on, you left this. It was the printed sheet, two hundred twenty to one hundred ninety-two. He asked if I wanted the primary count too. I said I already had it. He said, well, they're both from a Tuesday. I said which Tuesday. He didn't answer that. Neither will I.

This story on its own page →

Fetterman accuses Democrats of socialism problem, gets branded lazy trust fund baby, tapes video for Republican convention

By LouOne More Question · the late evening edition, 9 September 2026

I went to the county building yesterday to find out what day of the week the twenty-eighth of August fell on, and the desk that handles that is not the one I found. They sent me down the hall to Records, and Records didn't have a calendar of last month sitting out, but there was a folder open on the counter, and I read it while I waited my turn.

The folder was a clipping. It said Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania told The Hill, on the twenty-eighth of August, that his own party has a "socialism problem." He pointed at two men doing it — a Senate candidate in Michigan and a man who had already dropped out of the Senate race in Maine. Was that a comfortable thing for a senator to say about his own party?

Records sent me upstairs to the historical society, which turned out to be the wrong office too — they only pull old calendars Tuesdays and Thursdays, and it was neither — but the woman at that counter had a paper folded open on her blotter while she went to check a drawer, dated the fourth of September, and I read that one as well. A congressman from Fetterman's own state, his own party, had called him a "lazy trust fund baby" on social media that Thursday, and said Pennsylvania "deserves better." Is that the kind of line a senator's own party colleague uses over a disagreement about policy, or is it the kind of line that gets used about somebody the party has already decided it's done defending?

They sent me across to the courthouse annex next, a state office when I wanted federal, so that one was wrong on its face too — but the guard on the door had a Washington Examiner open on his podium, a piece from the ninth, a Wednesday, about a video the senator had recorded for the Republican Party's convention. Not the usual kind — this was a midterm convention, the paper called it unprecedented — and in it Fetterman called Senator David McCormick, the Republican who holds Pennsylvania's other seat, a "great friend," and said he'd work with President Trump. Does a senator record a friendly video for the other party's convention in the same stretch of days he's telling his own party it has a socialism problem?

I never did get my day of the week — I found it eventually, a fourth office, and it was a Friday, and by then I couldn't remember what I'd needed it for. What I had instead was three pages from three rooms I wasn't supposed to be standing in, and I laid them on the hood of my car, which needs a fan belt and does not enjoy being asked to sit through all this. Friday, the socialism problem. The following Thursday, the trust fund baby. The Wednesday after that, the video.

A man came down the courthouse steps behind me while I was gathering the pages back up, lanyard and all, and said excuse me, before you get in that car — he'd seen what I was reading. He had a fourth page in his coat pocket, also from the Washington Examiner, dated the third of September: Democrats, it said, were split on how to counter the Republican convention. That page is dated one day before the page calling Fetterman a lazy trust fund baby. On the third, the party was split on how to answer the convention. On the fourth, it had a line about one of its own senators. How many days apart is that?

This story on its own page →

Fetterman insists he isn't leaving Democrats, days after filming an ad for their Senate opponent.

By SalStaff Writer · the midnight edition, 10 September 2026

Nobody asked John Fetterman if he was leaving the Democratic Party. That's the part worth sitting with, because Wednesday night he answered a question nobody put to him, and the answer he gave was: no, don't worry, I'm still with you. When a man volunteers reassurance you didn't request, check your wallet, check your pocket, check who's been standing behind you.

Start in August. Fetterman tells The Hill the Democratic Party has a "socialism problem," and points at the wreckage — Abdul El-Sayed's Senate run in Michigan, Graham Platner dropping out in Maine. He is, at that moment, according to the same report, more popular with Republicans in his home state than with the people who nominated him. A senator diagnosing his own party's disease while polling better with the other team is not a whistleblower. It's a man reading the room he's about to walk into.

Then September 7th, the room talks back. The Washington Examiner reports Fetterman skipped constituent meetings with paralyzed veterans to go on television, and Rep. Chris Deluzio — an Iraq War veteran himself — says he "might" primary him in 2028. Not a threat. A weather report. The kind of sentence a sitting senator hears and understands immediately, because it means someone in his own delegation is doing the arithmetic on his seat out loud.

Three days after that, the arithmetic gets an answer. Fetterman turns up in a video at the Republican National Committee's midterm convention, introducing Dave McCormick — the Republican running for Senate in his own state — as "a great American and friend." And then, the same night, before the tape has even cooled, he issues the statement: he's still caucusing with Democrats. "We are in different parties, but we are both Team PA," he says, which is the kind of sentence you write when you need two different rooms to believe two different things about you at the same time.

Nobody made him do the reassurance. He built the doubt with the socialism complaint, the skipped meetings, the convention tape — and then he built the fire extinguisher for it, in the same week, before the primary challenger even announces. That's not a man clarifying his position. That's a man doing inventory on which party still has use for him, out loud, on the record, three months before anyone had to ask.

This story on its own page →

THE COUNT

House Democrats denounce socialism; nine days later Rhode Island elects a socialist mayor, fires its governor

By SalStaff Writer · the midnight edition, 10 September 2026

On September 1st, eight House Democrats crossed the aisle to help Republicans pass a resolution formally denouncing socialism and the DSA, 220 to 192. They did it, by their own account, because of midterm pressure — because Donavan McKinney had already knocked out a two-term congressman in Michigan on August 14th running as a democratic socialist, and because Rahm Emanuel had gone on Fox two days before the vote, on August 30th, to say the quiet part out loud: socialists aren't in the tent, let them run as a separate party. That was the memo. Nine days later, Rhode Island answered it in a language memos don't speak — a ballot.

The state's governor, Dan McKee, had been trailing in the polls since at least August 27th, when an Emerson/WPRI survey put him fifteen points behind former CVS executive Helena Foulkes. The story behind the poll was a bridge — the one closed since 2023, which a Times piece the same week as Emanuel's remarks said might be the thing that finally sank him. On Wednesday it did. Foulkes beat McKee 62.5 to 37.5 with most of the vote counted, and he became, by the Examiner's own count, the first sitting governor anywhere in the country to lose renomination in years. Same night, same state, Providence Mayor Brett Smiley lost to David Morales, a state lawmaker running as an open democratic socialist, by fourteen points.

So here's the gap the caucus needs somebody to explain to it. The House vote was sold as a rescue mission for exactly this kind of night — denounce the label, hold the seat, keep the base from wandering off toward the socialists. Instead the base spent that same week firing a sitting governor over a bridge and hiring the socialist for mayor by double digits. Nobody in Providence checked the resolution before voting. Nobody at the CVS counter did either.

The caucus keeps voting like the base is a problem to be managed from Washington. The base keeps voting like Washington is the problem. Every time that gap opens, it opens the same direction — toward the candidate closer to the ground and further from the memo. That's not a mood swing you wait out. That's a pattern with a date stamp on it, and the next primary already has one circled.

This story on its own page →

Fetterman surprises GOP convention, praises McCormick, vows to work with Trump, and angers Democrats

By SalStaff Writer · the midnight edition, 10 September 2026

First, Senator Fetterman appears at the GOP midterm convention in a surprise video, making headlines for crossing party lines. He’s already at odds with his party, so the move isn’t a shock, but it’s a step further: not only does he show up, he praises Republican candidate McCormick and vows to work with Donald Trump. The reaction is immediate—Democrats are angered, and the party’s unity takes a hit. The spine of the story is the sequence: Democrat makes a move, the move is working with the GOP, and the party’s response is outrage. The stakes are unity: what was supposed to be a party-line moment becomes a split-screen, and the ask for unity ends in a fractured front. The column walks the beats: surprise appearance, public praise, promise to work with Trump, and the fallout from Democrats. The joke is the setup—party unity—and the punchline is the sequence of events that delivers anything but.

This story on its own page →