Justice & Legal

Trump feasts 100 outdoorsmen at Rose Garden dinner, quietly thins protections for what they hunt

By MortThe Records Bureau · the late evening edition, 17 September 2026

The Endangered Species Act, a federal protection born of statute, died this week. It is survived by a guest list of more than one hundred hunters, anglers, and outdoor-industry officials, and preceded in death by two siblings: the Clean Water Act's stream and wetland protections, which the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers said on September 4th they would consider narrowing further, and the rule limiting planet-heating pollution from coal and gas power plants, which the EPA moved on September 14th to end outright.

The family gathered Thursday evening in the Rose Garden. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum was among the invited. The President told the assembled hunters and anglers that public lands belong to the public, then signed two executive orders reversing Biden-era restrictions on that public land, and mentioned that an "Outdoors Act 2.0" was on its way. Whippersnapper energy, promising a sequel to a bill that has not yet had its premiere.

The next day's wire carried the quieter news. A memo reducing protections under the Endangered Species Act — the law that prohibits any "take" of a listed species — moved that same week without a Rose Garden, without a toast. No guest announced it from a podium. It simply happened, the way the water rule happened on September 4th and the power-plant rule happened on September 14th: a filing, not a party.

Call it the pattern, if patterns are allowed a name: what gets a hundred guests and a signature ceremony is access — who gets to hunt, who gets to fish. What gets a memo alone, on a quiet news day, is the thing that decides whether there is anything left on that land to hunt or fish for. One is a photograph. The other is a species. The dinner made the evening news. The memo made a paragraph.

This is not a complaint about hunters, who are, in this columnist's long experience, decent people who understand a food chain better than most policy shops do. It is a complaint about the order of operations: the invitation goes out before the impact study, the toast comes before the count. Malarkey, dressed as access.

In lieu of flowers, the family asks that anyone invited to the next Rose Garden dinner request, out loud, before any signature is added, a copy of whatever memo is moving through the building that same week.

This story on its own page →

LA's homeless authority dissolves after its outreach network forged signatures; New York Post calls it sanity.

By MortThe Records Bureau · the late evening edition, 17 September 2026

They built a network to find guys sleeping under an overpass, and somebody used that exact list to fake ballot signatures — then the agency dissolves and the New York Post calls it sanity. That's not a coincidence, that's a cleanup crew. The people who used to be counted on LAHSA's rolls don't get housed by "sanity," they just get uncounted.

This story on its own page →

Manufacturers call EPA's gutted power-plant pollution rule 'a game changer,' demand more.

By MortThe Records Bureau · the late evening edition, 17 September 2026

The Endangered Species Act, a federal protection born of statute, died this month by memo. It is survived by the hunting and fishing limits rolled back the same week, and preceded in death by two siblings: the Clean Water Act's stream and wetland protections, which the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers said on September 4th they would consider narrowing further, and the rule limiting planet-heating pollution from coal and gas power plants, which the same agency moved on September 14th to end outright.

The family gathered first in the Rose Garden, more than a hundred hunters and anglers invited to hear that public lands belong to the public, the President signing two executive orders before the coffee was poured. Bunk, a mourner might have called the whole arrangement, if any of the mourners had come to mourn.

None did. On Thursday, thirteen days after the Clean Water Act announcement and three days after the power plant rule ended, a trade group arrived at the funeral wearing a suit. Jay Timmons, chief executive of the National Association of Manufacturers, told Fox News that the EPA's rollback of Biden-era power plant emissions standards was "a game changer" — and then, standing over the open casket, asked for more. Additional permitting reform, he said, was still needed. The dead were barely dressed for viewing and the industry was already filing a request for the next body.

This is how the file grows. A dinner becomes a memo becomes a rule becomes a rollback becomes, at last, a testimonial — each beat quieter than the last, each one somebody else's Thursday. The protections did not fail a stress test or lose a vote. They were declared inconvenient, one at a time, to men who were then invited to say thank you in front of cameras, and it feels like shit to anyone who still fishes the streams this narrows.

Nobody in this story is shocked. That is the arrangement working as intended.

Endangered Species Act protections, Clean Water Act protections, and the power plant emissions rule are survived by the National Association of Manufacturers, which finds them a game changer, and by whatever comes next on the permitting docket.

In lieu of flowers, the family asks that mourners stop sending trade associations to cheer at funerals and start asking who is paying for the flowers.

This story on its own page →

Trump eased hunting limits, cut species protections by memo, and industry called the rollback 'a game changer.'

By MortThe Records Bureau · the midnight edition, 18 September 2026

The Endangered Species Act, a federal protection under law, died this month by memo. It is survived by the hunting and fishing limits rolled back the same week, and preceded in death by a sibling: the Clean Water Act's stream and wetland protections, which the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers said on September 4th they would consider narrowing further. The family gathered in the Rose Garden — more than a hundred hunters and anglers invited to hear that public lands belong to the public, the President signing executive orders rolling back hunting and fishing restrictions and teasing a sequel, an Outdoors Act 2.0, for later. The same week, a separate memo did the quieter work: reducing what counts as protected under the Endangered Species Act, the law that prohibits any "take" of a listed species. A memo doesn't need a Rose Garden.

Cause of death, for the record: not repeal, which requires Congress and a vote somebody has to answer for, but memo, which requires a signature and nothing else. The Act is not gone from the books. It is gone from the ground — from whatever creek or wetland now sits one narrowing away from unprotected, waiting on the next Friday announcement.

The obituary would end there, except the trade came for its cut. A manufacturers' group looked at the administration's separate EPA rollback — its own deregulation, running on its own track — and called it a game changer. Not a burden lifted, not a compliance cost trimmed. A game changer, the kind of phrase usually reserved for a product launch, applied here to a regulation that used to cost the manufacturer something. Whatever changed, it changed for the manufacturer, not for the creek, not for the species the memo just stopped counting.

That is the arrangement, stated plainly: a dinner for a hundred, a memo for the rest of the ledger, and a trade association cheering from a sideline it was never really standing on. Malarkey, all of it, dressed as access — access to public land, access to markets, access to whatever "take" still means once enough memos have narrowed it.

In lieu of flowers, ask your representative for a floor vote. A memo can be undone by another memo. A vote is the only funeral anyone has to attend.

This story on its own page →

Trump's ballot verification system dies at six months old, verified zero ballots

By MortThe Records Bureau · the midnight edition, 18 September 2026

They spent six months and God knows how much money building a list to check your ballot against, and the whole time two people inside that building were screaming in writing that the thing would eat votes whole. Now it's dead, nobody built anything, and nobody's paying for the warning that turned out right. That's your mail, sitting on a shelf they built for it, going nowhere.

This story on its own page →

THE STATUTE

Lawsuits are forcing enforcement of the law that already banned armed ICE officers from polling places.

By The Wrecking CrewThe Remedy Desk · the sunrise edition, 18 September 2026

THE PLAN

The chief starts the job the way this crew starts every job: an inventory of the pile already on site before anyone touches a torch. What's already built, what's already law, what's just gathering dust because no one's picked it up.

The planner lays the redacted DHS email on the table first — a list of jurisdictions that offer election materials in languages other than English, compiled and passed around inside the department, the reason for it blacked out by the department's own redactions. NPR got that one, and a second story running the same week: armed federal officers turning up near polling places, floated more than once by the administration, isn't a gray area. It's already illegal. A coalition including UnidosUS filed suit over it; the group's president, Janet Murguía, called sending armed ICE agents to polling places "voter suppression, plain and simple."

The tinkerer pulls the actual statute off the shelf and blows the dust off it — it's been sitting there the whole time nobody needed it enforced. Ballot delivery gets handled on a separate track: back in March the administration ordered the Postal Service to restrict how ballots move through the mail. In August a federal judge in Boston blocked those rules outright. By September the Supreme Court had declined, for the third time on its emergency docket, over two dissents, to revive any version of it.

The muscle takes the other piece of the same machine apart: a computer system meant to verify mail-in ballots, ordered up separately under executive authority. This week the Postal Service's own chief told the Associated Press the agency has simply stopped the work — "we're not doing anything." No court needed for that one. It just stalled on its own.

The pilot lines the pieces up on the runway: a list nobody will explain, a verification system nobody's running, officers a law already bars, and a coalition suing to make that bar hold. Each piece of the machine that was supposed to move quietly instead threw a lawsuit, a redaction, or a postmaster's own admission into the open. The tool for the armed-officer piece was sitting on the shelf the whole time. It just took a filing to pick it up.

This story on its own page →

THE BAN

Trump denies 'assault on the free press,' a phrase he coined himself, four days after banning three outlets.

By ChipStaff Writer · the coffee break edition, 21 September 2026

"Routine access management." That is the phrase the White House would like used here, and for the length of this column, so will I.

On Friday afternoon the President posted, effective immediately, that CNN, MSNOW and Politico would no longer be welcome at the White House — a personnel matter, a facilities matter, a matter of who gets a badge and who does not, not, as certain outlets have suggested, an assault. Over the weekend their credentials were confiscated and their reporters turned away at the gate, which sounds severe only if you've never worked in access control, where confiscating a badge is what access control is, in the same way an assault is what happens when you're barred from a building you have a legal right to enter — no. Strike that. That is not what I meant to say.

Where was I. Monday, the networks suspended pool coverage of the President in protest, which is their prerogative, just as it is the White House's prerogative to decide who sits in the room — the same prerogative it exercised in February 2017, when CNN and Politico, among seven other outlets, were locked out of a Friday gaggle while friendlier outlets were waved through. A coincidence of scheduling that happened to recur, nine years later, against the same two names. That is not a pattern. A pattern would require intent, and intent is not something a credential scanner can prove, whatever the outlets are now arguing in the First Amendment suit they filed Monday — the same day the President, addressing that suit directly, wrote that "the White House is not instituting an assault on the Free Press, something which I cherish." His words. Not mine. Though I notice I've now typed the word twice in a column I was hired to keep out of it.

To be clear: banning three newsrooms from covering the government they cover is not an assault on the free press. It is a lawsuit waiting to be filed, which it now has been, by CNN, MS NOW and Politico, arguing exactly that. It is also, per the record, the second time he's done it to some of the same outlets. The White House calls this consistency. I was told to call it that too. I'm having some trouble with that.

This story on its own page →

THE BLACKOUT

Trump bans three outlets for negative stories, ribbon-cutting airs with no audio after networks boycott

By ChipStaff Writer · the early evening edition, 21 September 2026

On Friday the President announced, in a Truth Social post, that CNN, MS NOW and Politico were banned from the White House, effective immediately, over what he called their constant reporting of "FAKE NEWS." We called it a housekeeping decision. It was not a housekeeping decision. It was, in his own words, a punishment for coverage he didn't like, and there's no version of this where we pretend otherwise for very long.

By Saturday morning, the three outlets said their journalists had been denied access to the White House grounds — which we described at the time as a routine credentialing matter. It was not a routine credentialing matter. It was three outlets, denied access, one day after the President said on social media that he was banning them.

On Monday, the outlets sued, calling the ban a "blatant violation" of the First Amendment, and the administration answered by pointing to Barack Obama's attempts, years ago, to limit Fox News's coverage of his presidency. We are standing on that comparison. The receipts say Obama tried to limit Fox's coverage; we removed three outlets entirely from the grounds of the White House. Those are two very different policies, and I have been asked to describe them as identical.

The rest of the television pool did not see it our way either. ABC, CBS, NBC and even Fox News declined to staff Monday's pool rotation in solidarity with the outlets we banned, and no replacement pool was arranged. The result was a ribbon-cutting for the President's new White House helipad that aired with no audio at all — not because we removed anyone from the grounds that day, but because the networks who normally carry the President's voice chose not to.

The President has already moved past the merits. Told the case had been assigned to a judge he called "great, for them," he made clear Monday he expects to lose at the district court and may be forced to let the three outlets' reporters back in. In August, before any of this started, he'd already told NBC he'd refer Kristen Welker to the FCC over an election segment he didn't like. This has been the shape of it for a month now: the complaint, the punishment, the citation to a smaller precedent, and eventually, we're told, the retreat. We remain confident in our legal position. I am told to remain confident.

This story on its own page →