Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., said that Democrats should not prioritize impeaching President Donald Trump if they win control of the House in the upcoming midterm elections, but instead should focus on making life more affordable
Page A3From§Eachthe evening edition — 30 August 2026
RNC chair warns Democratic majority poses 'direct threat to the Jewish community'; Democrats vow no impeachment push.
As it ran on the front
Let's take the RNC chairman's warning seriously, because that's what serious people do: a Democratic majority in Congress, he says, represents a direct threat to the Jewish community. That's a strong claim, and strong claims deserve scrutiny, so let's scrutinize the other half of the story, which is that the man leading House Democrats toward that supposed majority, Jim Clyburn, is on record saying impeachment shouldn't even be a priority if they win. That's — that's actually the opposite of a threat posture. That's restraint. That's a senior member publicly lowering the temperature before he's even got the gavel.
Now, the argument, as I understand it, is about who gets 'put in power' inside a majority — committee chairs, leadership slots, that sort of thing — and the concern is that certain members with certain views would gain influence. That's a coalition-math argument, and coalition math is fair game. But framing coalition math as a 'direct threat' to a specific community is — I want to defend this, I really do, but a direct threat implies action, imminent, specific, and what we actually have on record from the Democratic side is a senior member volunteering not to use the most aggressive tool available to him. That's the opposite signal.…
…(cont) If the worry is genuinely about who gains power, the data point we have today is a top Democrat de-escalating, not escalating. I can say the warning is about structural risk, not current leadership's stated intentions, and that's technically true, but it does mean the 'direct threat' language is doing more work than the receipts support today.
Here's what I'll stand by: warnings like this poll well. They rally a base. They don't require the warned-about majority to actually exist yet, and they don't require a single concrete action to point to — just a hypothetical caucus and a scary adjective. Clyburn, meanwhile, made an actual statement about an actual priority list. One of these is a prediction. One is a policy position. I was told to defend the prediction. I'm having some trouble finding the part where it's falsifiable.
“One party's chairman says giving the other party a majority is a direct threat to an entire community, and the other party's answer is basically 'we won't even impeach the guy.' That's not a fight, that's one side swinging and the other side promising to sit down first.”
“The Chairman is raising a legitimate concern about coalition politics within a future Democratic majority — that's not fearmongering, that's — okay, it's phrased as fearmongering, I'll grant that, but the underlying point about who gets empowered in a caucus is real. And Clyburn saying impeachment isn't a priority proves — actually, that kind of undercuts the whole 'direct threat' framing, doesn't it. Never mind.”
The receipts
Antisemitic incidents in 2025: 6,274 - the third-highest year since tracking began in 1979, with assaults at a record high ADL, 2025 Audit of Antisemitic Incidents
RNC chair claims Dem majority in Congress will put antisemites in power: ‘Direct threat to the Jewish community’A Democratic takeover of Congress will put antisemites in power and pose a "direct threat to the Jewish community," Republican National Committee Chairman Joe Gruters claims.
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.