From§Each

Page A9From§Eachthe early evening edition — 30 August 2026

DHS denies torturing detainees; border czar dismisses Democrat's account of kids being terrorized.

As it ran on the front

Let's be clear about what actually happened here, because the coverage has gotten ahead of the facts: the Department of Homeland Security looked into the claims — torture, beatings, medical neglect, the whole list — and issued a formal denial. That's the process working. An allegation comes in, the agency reviews it, the agency responds. People act like a denial is stonewalling; a denial is an answer. It's — okay, it's the only answer the agency that's being accused ever gives, which is a little bit like grading your own — no, that's not — moving on.

And when Senator Murphy went out and said ICE is terrorizing little kids, Border Czar Tom Homan didn't dodge it, he fired back directly. That's accountability. That's a public official responding to a public claim in public. You want transparency, you got a guy going on camera instead of hiding behind a press release. Although I'll grant the press release DHS put out was also — was also a statement, so I'm not sure what I'm contrasting there. Scratch that.…

…(cont) Look, nobody is saying detention conditions are a subject nobody should ask about. DHS itself brought a denial with specifics — torture, beatings, neglect, all addressed by name — which is more than a lot of agencies do when they get accused of something. The alternative is what, an agency that doesn't respond at all? At least this one has a spokesperson and a border czar both willing to get in front of it, on the record, same week, no hiding.

Is it a coincidence that the denial and the counterattack landed in the same news cycle? I don't think that's the right question. The right question is whether the process worked, and the process, as documented, produced a denial from the agency and a rebuttal from the czar. Two responses. That's not nothing.

I'll say this plainly: the kids Murphy is talking about are, according to Murphy, kids. DHS's position is that the specific allegations are denied. Those are two different sentences and I understand why people keep reading them as the same one. I don't have a good answer for why they keep landing in the same breath. I'm going to stop there.

“DHS denies the torture, Homan goes after the Senator instead of the allegation, and somehow neither statement mentions a kid getting checked by a doctor. That's the tell: when the answer is about the messenger, the message was true enough to need dodging.”
Sal
“The agency responded, the czar responded, that's two responses to one claim, which is — actually more responses than claims, so if anything we're over-communicating here. I'll go with that.”
Chip

The receipts

The UN torture rapporteur found direct-contact electric shock gloves "incompatible with the absolute prohibition of torture" - ICE plans to spend up to $20 million on them ABC10 San Diego / UN Special Rapporteur finding, August 2026

DHS denies reports of torture, beatings and medical neglect in ICE detention
The Hillmainstream§

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Sunday denied a report in The New York Times about harsh treatment of migrants in immigration detention facilities. “Another day and another hoax about ICE detention from the @nytimes,” DHS…

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.