From§Each

Page A11From§Eachthe early bird edition — 31 August 2026

Vance calls Senate hopeful 'very, very evil,' warns him to keep his wife's name out of his mouth.

As it ran on the front

Let's be clear about what actually happened here, because the coverage has gotten away from the facts. The Vice President was asked about a Senate candidate in Michigan, and he answered honestly. He called Abdul El-Sayed 'very, very evil.' Twice, according to NBC and The Hill, which independently confirmed the quote, which — and I want to be precise about this — means it wasn't a slip. It was a considered characterization, repeated for emphasis. That's called conviction. That's called not being mealy-mouthed. That's called — actually, hold on, let me back up.

The word 'evil' applied to a sitting candidate for federal office is, on its face, a serious escalation in political rhetoric, and I understand why that reads as inflammatory to some. But context matters. The context is that Mr. El-Sayed apparently said something that upset the Vice President enough that he then separately told him to keep his wife's name out of his mouth, publicly, in the Washington Examiner. Two separate confrontations, same week, same target. I'm told that's a coincidence of scheduling and not, as some have suggested, a pattern of escalating personal attacks against a Senate candidate roughly six weeks before voters start paying attention to this race. I don't write the calendar.…

…(cont) Here's what I'd say to critics: the Vice President is allowed to defend his family. Every politician is allowed to defend his family. Nobody is disputing that. What's being disputed is whether 'very, very evil' — a phrase he used, on the record, about a man running for the United States Senate — constitutes a defense of anything, or whether it's the opening move. I think it's — look, I think the American people can decide for themselves whether calling your opponent evil twice in one news cycle, then confronting him over his wife, is a pattern or isn't. I'm not going to characterize it as a pattern. I said I wasn't going to characterize it and then I just characterized it. That's on me.

The bottom line is voters in Michigan will decide this race, not cable news chyrons, and certainly not two headlines from the same week being read next to each other like they mean something.

“Notice the order: first he brands a Senate candidate 'evil' on the record, twice, in two separate outlets, then he pivots to defending his own wife's honor like he's the one who got insulted. That's the escalation ladder — call the guy a monster, then act wounded when anyone reacts.”
Sal
“The Senator was simply defending his family, that's not — okay, 'evil' is a strong word to use about a political opponent twice in one news cycle, but context matters here, the — I don't have the context. It's a tough primary season.”
Chip

The receipts

Vance calls El-Sayed 'very, very evil'
The Hillmainstream§

Vice President Vance lashed out at Democratic Michigan Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed at a campaign style rally in Detroit on Monday, labeling him as “evil.” "There's something about Abdul El-Sayed that is very, very evil and on the rise in…

Abdul el Sayed seeks campaign reset amid Hasan Piker fallout
Washington Examinerright§

Democrat Abdul el Sayed, the Michigan Senate nominee, is seeking to hit reset after a brutal August in which he couldn’t move past his association with Hasan Piker. But short of fully denouncing the controversial Twitch streamer with a…

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.