From§Each

Page F4From§Eachthe late evening edition — 31 August 2026

FTC sues Amazon for hidden advertiser fees; Detroit pays kids $1,000 just to attend class.

By RuthThe Money Desk · the late evening edition, 31 August 2026

Photograph via New York Post, from “Detroit Public Schools are paying kids up to $1,000 just to attend class — and teaching them an awful lesson”, 31 August 2026 — the original report

As it ran on the front

Two filings came in this week, and they don't reconcile.

Filing one: the Federal Trade Commission, joined by twenty-two state attorneys general, sued Amazon over what the complaint calls hidden surcharges charged to advertisers — fees folded into the bill that the advertiser didn't see coming. Twenty-three offices of government, combined, decided that was worth a federal lawsuit.…

…(cont) Filing two: Detroit Public Schools began paying students up to one thousand dollars just to attend class. Not a scholarship. Not a stipend for grades. A per-seat payment for showing up, because the district's attendance numbers had fallen far enough that cash became the intervention.

Run those two filings against each other and the gap isn't in the dollar amount, hon — it's in the enforcement. One problem, hidden advertiser fees, got twenty-three government offices and a federal complaint. The other problem, a school district paying children cash to physically enter a building, got a program. No lawsuit. No joint task force. No twenty-two attorneys general asking why a public school system arrived at a per-seat payment as the fix instead of, say, transportation, or meals, or the underlying reasons attendance collapsed in the first place.

That's not an accusation, it's a filing comparison. The FTC's theory of the Amazon case is that a hidden fee, buried where the advertiser can't see it, is the kind of thing regulators exist to catch. Nobody's filed the equivalent theory for a school district whose budget gap got buried until the fix on offer was a cash bounty for a fourth grader.

Whose column does that gap turn up in? Not Amazon's advertisers — they got a lawsuit filed on their behalf. Not the district's families — they got a check, funded by cutting something else, because Detroit Public Schools does not have a line item marked surplus. The families got the workaround. The advertisers got the regulator. Both of those are dollar-sign stories. Only one of them got twenty-three offices of government to open a file.

“They'll tell you there's no money for schools, then somehow Detroit finds a grand a head to get kids in their seats while twenty-three government offices found the staff to sue Amazon over a hidden fee. There's money — it just goes wherever there's a lawsuit to win, not a classroom to fund.”
Sal
“The FTC case is about deceptive fee disclosure, that's a consumer protection issue, completely different bucket than a district's attendance strategy — Detroit's program is incentive-based, it's not a symptom of a failing — I didn't mean 'failing,' strike that.”
Chip

The receipts

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.