‘I think people are right to be concerned’
Page A8From§Eachthe milkman edition — 1 September 2026
DeSantis moves to remove Flock cameras from Florida highways after Pennsylvania candidate calls them 'an invasion of privacy.'
-36.png)
As it ran on the front
Two Republicans, two coasts, same week, same complaint: license-plate cameras are an invasion of privacy. In Pennsylvania, a Senate candidate says so out loud, on the record, calling for a statewide ban. In Florida, the governor doesn't just say it, he orders the cameras off state highways. That's not a coincidence, that's a company running out of cover.
Flock Safety's cameras sit in thousands of communities now, quietly building what license-plate databases always build: a record of where every car went, and when, and how often, held by a private company that answers subpoenas nobody gets to see. Departments bought in for stolen cars and Amber Alerts. What they got was a rolling log of every plate that passed a Flock pole, searchable, shareable, and — until this week, apparently — invisible to the politicians who approved the contracts.…
…(cont) Now watch the sequence. It's not civil liberties groups driving this pullback, though they've been saying it for years. It's not a court ruling. It's a gubernatorial order and a campaign talking point, arriving the same week, from a party that has spent two decades expanding what a badge can see without a warrant. Something changed the calculation. Maybe it's the realization that a camera doesn't check party registration before it logs a plate. Maybe it's simpler than that.
Either way, the receipts are the receipts: a candidate calling for a ban, a governor issuing an order, both citing privacy, neither citing a specific incident that changed their mind. When power suddenly discovers a civil liberty, the first question isn't whether the liberty is real. It's whose file just got pulled.
None of this means the cameras should stay up. It means the reason they're coming down isn't the one on the press release. A surveillance network that took years to build, funded by hundreds of local budgets, doesn't get switched off over a philosophy. It gets switched off when it points at the wrong car. The privacy argument was always available. It just wasn't urgent until this week. Ask why this week.
“When the small-government crowd starts ripping license-plate readers off the poles the same week on two different coasts, it's not privacy, it's that the camera finally pointed somewhere inconvenient. Watch who screams about a camera and who keeps it running everywhere else.”
“These cameras were a public safety tool to catch stolen vehicles and fugitives, full stop — well, and track vehicles more broadly, but that's not — look, the point is safety, not surveillance, and if anyone's uncomfortable with a rolling database of everyone's movements, that's a conversation for another department.”
The receipts
EXCLUSIVE — The Republican nominee for governor in Pennsylvania supports a ban on Flock cameras, the latest sign of how unpopular the vehicle tracking technology has become in races across the country. In a statement provided by her…
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.