From§Each

Page A10From§Eachthe early bird edition — 2 September 2026

Whistleblower ordered to 'find and pursue crimes' got a deleted email as backup, then hours with federal investigators.

“Fed investigators met with Tish James whistleblower who claimed he was pushed to dig up dirt on Trump: sources”, 2 September 2026 (Photo via New York Post — the original report)

As it ran on the front

I want to walk through a filing with you, because the filing is doing all the work here and I'd hate for you to miss a clause.

On August 30th, a former prosecutor out of the Attorney General's office in New York told reporters that they'd been ordered, as part of their job, to find and pursue crimes — not crimes reported to them, not crimes that turned up in the course of an investigation, but crimes attached in advance to a specific name: Donald Trump, and, for good measure, Truth Social. The office's own bureau chief, the prosecutor said, gave the instruction directly. No probable cause was cited as a starting point, because the starting point was the defendant.…

…(cont) That's a serious claim about a state law enforcement office, and serious claims are supposed to evaporate under scrutiny. This one did the opposite. On Tuesday, an email surfaced — a deleted email, recovered from wherever deleted things go when someone remembers to ask nicely — and it did not contradict the prosecutor. It matched. All together now: "find and pursue crimes." Four words, previously believed erased, now Exhibit A.

I am not going to speculate about who hit delete or why, because I don't have that filing and I don't invent filings. What I have is the sequence, and the sequence is the whole story: a person says they were told to manufacture a case against a political opponent of the state; the office's own paper trail says the same thing in the same words; and federal investigators, presented with both, did the responsible thing and sat the whistleblower down for several hours on Tuesday to go through it.

Several hours is not a coffee break. Several hours is the amount of time it takes to walk a person through a directive, an org chart, and an email that outlived its own deletion. The Attorney General's office runs on the public's trust and the public's payroll — the prosecutor's original complaint, in fact, was about taxpayer money spent chasing one man instead of one law. If the email holds up the way it's holding up so far, the office will have spent that money proving the prosecutor right.

Nobody broke into anything to get this story. Nobody needed to. The office wrote it down, then tried to unwrite it, and the unwriting didn't take. That's not a caper. That's a filing cabinet with a long memory.

“You want to know where the budget went? Not roads, not schools — into a task force built to find crimes and hang them on one guy after the fact, and when the email proving it turned up deleted, that's not a paperwork error, that's a paper trail somebody tried to shred. The one who told on them gets a multi-hour sit-down with the feds; the office that gave the order gets a press statement.”
Sal
“An internal review turning up a stray email doesn't mean anything except that the Attorney General's office is thorough — thorough enough to investigate its own people, which, if you think about it, is basically self-policing at its finest. "Find and pursue crimes" is just standard prosecutorial language, we find crimes, that's the job — did I just say the target got picked before the crime did? That's not what I meant, strike that.”
Chip

The receipts

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.