From§Each

Page F2From§Eachthe sunrise edition — 5 September 2026

Commerce Secretary who confirmed data centers 'suck water' now calls the same fact 'propaganda.'

“Democrats see midterm gift in Trump embrace of data centers”, 5 September 2026 (Photo via The Hill — the original report)

As it ran on the front

I've got a page in my coat pocket I keep meaning to file and never do. Torn it out of the paper a couple days back — right corner's ripped where the dog got to it before I did. Got a name on it, Howard Lutnick, and a word I wrote in the margin so I wouldn't lose it. I'll get to the word. Bear with me.

The page says the Commerce Secretary went on CNBC and laughed off the people sore about data centers using water. Chuckled, it says. And down at the bottom, in quotes, his answer for anybody who's counting: "propaganda." That's the word in my margin. I wrote it down because I recognized the fella — same man, or somebody standing right next to him, is on the record earlier saying, plain, that these places do in fact use the water. "Suck water" is the phrase the piece uses for it. So which is it — do they suck water, or is the sucking a story somebody made up? I'm not saying. I'm just the guy with the torn page.…

…(cont) Here's where it gets confusing for a man with one calendar on the wall. The Secretary's "propaganda" line is dated September 2nd. Two days before that — August 31st, the last day of the month — the President posted that any town that won't take a data center is going to end up "backwards and poor." Different months, technically, by a single day. I checked it twice because I didn't trust myself the first time.

So I've got a Secretary telling the country the water complaint is manufactured, and a President telling the same country, in that same stretch of days, that the towns saying no are headed for poverty. A man doesn't warn you about the cost of turning something down unless the something costs somebody, somewhere, real money — or real water. I'm only asking. Nobody's handed me the transcript that settles it.

Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez had a thought on the matter too — said if the President's so sure these places are such a gift, he ought to put one in at his own house down in Florida. I don't have Mar-a-Lago's water bill. Nobody's handed me that page either.

I went out to the yard with the hose Thursday — raincoat still on the passenger seat, sky clear enough I didn't need it — and ran the water for exactly as long as it takes me to walk to the mailbox and back. Little over a minute. I know because I counted it. It's not nothing, water, when you're the one paying for it by the gallon. I don't have the number for what one of these facilities runs through in a day. I have what my hose does in sixty-some seconds, and I have a Secretary of Commerce calling the whole concern "propaganda" on national television, and I have the fact that I am not on national television.

Both parties, I'm told, are running ads about this now — millions of dollars worth, pointed at each other, over the same set of buildings. Which is its own kind of answer, isn't it. When two sides that agree on nothing agree to spend real money arguing about the same fact, somebody down the line usually believes the fact is real.

Oh — before you go. I almost walked off with it still in my pocket. I said I'd only need the word once, and I'm sorry, because I told you I'd be back for it, and here it is: propaganda.

“The guy tells CNBC the water thing is "propaganda," and the President's out there the same week telling towns without a data center they'll end up "backwards and poor" — that's not two separate messes, that's one guy's own paper trail arguing with itself. You don't threaten a town with poverty over a building that isn't costing anybody anything. Somebody's water bill is about to prove which quote was the lie.”
Sal
“Look, "suck water" and "propaganda" are two totally different contexts — one's a technical acknowledgment, the other's pushback on the politicization, and if you can't see the nuance there that's honestly a you problem. He never said data centers don't use water, he said the concern is propaganda, which — okay, hearing it back, those might be the same sentence. Did I say that? That doesn't sound like me.”
Chip

The receipts

Democrats see midterm gift in Trump embrace of data centers
The Hillmainstream§

House Democrats see President Trump's embrace of data centers as a political gift, hoping the radioactive issue will help the party flip control of the chamber in November's midterms. The topic has emerged as a late campaign juggernaut given the sheer proliferation of data centers in a great many communities around the country, which…

Trump Commerce Secretary Once Said Data Centers ‘Suck Water,’ Now Scoffs That Such Concerns Are Just ‘Propaganda’ Trump's commerce secretary calls water use 'propaganda' as data centers drain millions of gallons a day
Common Dreams§

President Donald Trump's commerce secretary, Howard Lutnick, told a brazen lie on Wednesday while trying to defend the administration's support for rapid data center expansion amid growing public backlash from voters concerned about their extreme electricity and water use. Asked on CNBC's "SquawkBox" about how politicians in both parties…

· Out-of-Touch Trump Says Communities That Reject AI Data Centers Will Be 'Backwards and Poor' from the morgue, 31 Aug 2026

· AOC taunts Trump on data centers with Mar-a-Lago pitch as divides build from the morgue, 1 Sep 2026

· Trump gives GOP breathing room on data centers from the morgue, 27 Aug 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.