After a mistrial, Timothy Cruz must decide whether to retry Lindsay Clancy on first-degree murder charges, downgrade the charges or drop the case.
Page A3From§Eachthe supper edition — 5 September 2026
Massachusetts jury deadlocks three times on Lindsay Clancy; congressman, president reach verdict anyway.

As it ran on the front
Walk me through it. Not the verdict — there wasn't one — the actual days. I want to know how a jury spends five days in a room and comes out with nothing to show for it, step by step, because that's what the transcript says happened and that's the only part of this I trust.
Closing arguments finished the Thursday before Labor Day — August 28th, CBS had a legal contributor breaking down the arguments before the jury even had the case. Twelve people went in that Friday. By Tuesday, September 1st, the judge was already ordering them to keep deliberating — a stalemate, the Washington Examiner called it, the first one. Wednesday, September 2nd, same twelve, same room, told the judge for a second time they couldn't agree on whether a woman was criminally responsible for killing her own three children. That's the day the judge gave them what CBS described as the "dynamite charge" — I had to look that phrase up. It's a real instruction. Judges give it when a jury says it's stuck and the judge wants one more try. Twice, in five days. Show me another case on the docket this year where the jury got detonated twice.…
…(cont) They went back in a third time. Deadlocked again. The judge declared a mistrial. That's the record, in order: two stalemates, one dynamite charge, a third deadlock, no verdict.
Now walk me through the other half of it, because I keep losing the thread here. The same day the mistrial came down — September 5th — a sitting congressman from Texas went on Fox and said, quote, I don't have an ounce of sympathy for Lindsay Clancy. The same day, the President said she was going to pay the price. And in the coverage of that same segment, Republican leaders — that's the word the story uses, leaders, plural, I'm not putting a name on a quote that didn't come with one — are on record calling the trial itself a kangaroo court.
So here's the walk-through I can't finish without help. Twelve residents of Massachusetts sat in a room for five days, got sent back to deliberate twice, and told the judge on a third occasion they still could not agree. That's the documented outcome, filed under mistrial. On the same calendar day, a member of Congress and the President of the United States each arrived at a conclusion the jury itself did not reach. Walk me through the step where that happens. I have the page that says undecided. I have the page that says no sympathy. I'm asking where the two connect, because I've gone through both twice and I can't find it.
I tried to build this one out of the usual parts — the car, the garage, something with a belt or a hose I could point to — and it wouldn't hold. A hung jury isn't a stuck lock. There's no part with a name on it you can replace and say, there, that was the failure. Twelve people didn't get there. Three separate times, on the record. That's the whole demonstration, and I don't have a better one to offer you.
The prosecutor, Timothy Cruz, now has to decide whether to retry the case, downgrade the charges, or drop it — the Times had that part Friday too. He hasn't said which yet. As far as I can tell, going back through everything filed on this in the last week, he's the only person in the story on record saying he isn't sure.
Oh — one more thing, before I let you go. The congressman who says he has no sympathy, and the president who says she'll pay a price — neither one sat in that room for the five days. The jury did. And the jury is the one still not sure. Walk me through how the two of them got someplace the twelve people in the room didn't. I'll wait.
“This is the play: twelve people in Massachusetts couldn't get to guilty, so a congressman from Texas and the President did it for them, free of charge, before the mistrial paperwork was even filed. That's not law and order, that's a verdict with a layaway plan and no jury required. When "no sympathy" outranks "no verdict," you can see plainly what the announcement was actually for.”
“Look — a hung jury isn't an acquittal, and when people hear what happened to those kids, they're going to have feelings about it, Congressman Gill included. The President's entitled to comment on a case like anybody else with an opinion and a microphone. Did I just compare a sitting President to a guy with an opinion and a microphone? That's not really landing the way I wanted it to.”
The receipts
Trump says Lindsay Clancy will pay "the price" after a mistrial was declared when the jury deadlocked 11-1 in the Massachusetts murder case.
Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) said he has no sympathy for Lindsay Clancy after her murder trial ended in a mistrial, rejecting the defense’s argument that severe mental illness left her not criminally responsible for killing her three children. “I don’t have an ounce of sympathy for Lindsay Clancy,”
A judge in Massachusetts declared a mistrial in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, who killed her three young children, after jurors said for a third time they could not agree on a verdict.
· Judge in Lindsay Clancy trial orders jury to keep deliberating after stalemate from the morgue, 1 Sep 2026
· Breaking down the Lindsay Clancy murder trial closing arguments from the morgue, 28 Aug 2026
· Lindsay Clancy jury deadlocked for second time, judge orders "dynamite charge" from the morgue, 2 Sep 2026
· Lindsay Clancy jury still split over verdict in her murder trial from the morgue, 2 Sep 2026
· Lindsay Clancy didn't show 'break with reality' as jury weighs psychosis defense: Susan Smith prosecutor from the morgue, 27 Aug 2026
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.