From§Each

Page A2From§Eachthe breakfast edition — 6 September 2026

Sanders says progressives are winning the same week he says the party wants them to lose

As it ran on the front

I want to start with the date, because the date is the only thing on these pages I trust without checking twice. Top corner, both printouts, plain as the stub off a parking receipt: August 31. Not "late summer." Not "around then." August 31, 2026, stamped on two separate pages from two outlets that don't share a copy desk as far as I know — the Washington Examiner and Fox News. I wrote this down because I didn't believe it the first look: same day, same senator, two different rooms.

Here's what's under the date, and I'm reading this back off the page because I don't trust my own memory of it. The Examiner has Bernie Sanders saying top Democrats aren't enthusiastic enough about Abdul el Sayed to win Michigan — that the party's focus on el Sayed's association with a Twitch streamer is getting in the way of a race Sanders himself endorsed him for. Fox, same day, has Sanders going further: that some Democratic donors and party leaders may actually want their own nominee to lose, over what the piece calls progressive threats to oligarchy. Two outlets, one senator, one date, one Senate seat.…

…(cont) I keep a registration renewal in my glovebox I never throw out, because for about three weeks every year I've got two documents that are both true and both about the same car and they don't agree with each other — the old one says expired, the new one hasn't kicked in, and if a cop pulls me over in that window I've got a real problem explaining which piece of paper is the one that matters. That's not a metaphor I'm reaching for. That's just what's in my glovebox. I mention it because I don't know what you do with two documents about the same race, same day, where one says the party isn't trying hard enough and the other says part of the party might be trying for the other outcome entirely.

So I go back to the date again — and I apologize, I know I already brought it up, but I want to come at it from the other side this time. If a member of a party says, on the same day, in two separate interviews, that the leadership both isn't enthusiastic enough about a nominee and might prefer that nominee lose — is that one complaint stated two ways, or two different complaints? I don't know. I'm not equipped to know that. I just know both pages have August 31 on them.

Then there's the third page, and I want to be careful here because this is the one I keep circling back to without meaning to. Politico, September 6 — that's six days after the other two, I did the math sitting in the car — with Sanders saying the progressive wing of the Democratic Party is winning elections. Six days. Same senator. Same party. On the 31st, the concern on the record was that the establishment wasn't enthusiastic about a progressive nominee, or might prefer he lose. Six days later, the record has the wing that nominee belongs to described as winning.

Was the wing that couldn't get enthusiasm out of its own leadership on August 31 the same wing described as winning on September 6? I checked the party name on all three pages, and it was. Was the nominee gaining anything, losing anything, in those six days in between? I don't have a page that tells me that, so I won't guess at it.

Excuse me, one more thing before you go — I almost let this walk out the door without it, and it's not a big thing. It's just, I noticed something about the way I've been carrying these two printouts. I've had them folded together since the 31st, one on top of the other, and it wasn't until I sat down tonight that I noticed they've got the same date.

“Same guy, same week, telling you the wing is winning and the bosses want the nominee dead in the water — that's not a contradiction, that's the whole racket in one mouth. They need the base fired up enough to show up and donate, and cautious enough to never actually run the country. Pick a lane, Bernie, or don't, because Abdul el Sayed's still the one whose name is on the ballot.”
Sal
“Look, both things are true, that's not a gotcha — the wing can be winning nationally while one state party bungles one race, that's just federalism, did I say bungles, I mean, allocating enthusiasm regionally. And frankly if Sanders has a problem with his own party's donors he should take it up with them, not — okay, that's actually his point, never mind.”
Chip

The receipts

· Bernie Sanders says top Democrats aren’t enthusiastic enough about el Sayed to win Michigan from the morgue, 31 Aug 2026

· Bernie Sanders claims some Democrats may want their own Senate nominee to lose from the morgue, 31 Aug 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.