The Israeli newspaper Haaretz did not appear alarmed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's threat on Wednesday to sue the outlet over its new reporting that Netanyahu was explicitly warned about the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack that killed more than 1,200 Israelis and led to the Israel Defense Forces' destruction of Gaza. After…
Page A2From§Eachthe matinee edition — 9 September 2026
Netanyahu threatens suit over the Oct. 7 warning claim his wife is already being sued for making.

As it ran on the front
I didn't sleep Tuesday night. My wife told me to leave it alone — it's the Middle East, Lou, it's going to still be the Middle East in the morning whether you stare at the ceiling or not — and she was right, and I left it alone for about ten minutes, and then I got up and went out to sit in the car.
Didn't go anywhere. Fan belt's been complaining since July and I wasn't in the mood to hear it complain in the dark too. I just sat in the driveway with the dome light on, thinking about a letter.…
…(cont) Here's the letter. Haaretz runs a story Tuesday saying the Prime Minister of Israel was warned before October 7th — not vaguely, specifically: Yahya Sinwar telling an intermediary trusted by both Hamas and Israeli intelligence, in September of 2023, that an "earthquake" was coming. Three senior foreign sources, the paper says. Wednesday, the Prime Minister sends Haaretz a warning letter of his own — he intends to sue them for printing it. Haaretz says, in so many words, we stand by it.
A government not wanting to be told it had the warning and didn't stop the earthquake — I could have gone back inside on that alone.
What kept me in the driveway is the other lawsuit. There's a second person in that house being sued right now, this month, over the identical accusation — that leadership knew, in advance, and let it happen anyway. Except this time it isn't a newspaper saying it. It's Sara Netanyahu, the Prime Minister's wife, telling Channel 14 that the opposition leader — Yair Golan — had foreknowledge of October 7th and sat on it. And she's the one now facing a libel suit for saying it.
Same house. Same accusation, near enough — somebody up top knew something and didn't stop it. When a paper says it about the husband, the husband threatens to sue the paper. When the wife says it about the opponent, somebody sues the wife. I kept thinking about the toll plaza out on the turnpike, the one with two lanes for the same stretch of road — cash lane, fast lane, same road, same exit at the other end, different price depending which lane you were standing in when you went through. Same fact, sitting in that house like a car that can only find one of the two lanes.
I'm not going to sit here at two in the morning and tell you what any of that adds up to. I don't know what it adds up to. I know two lawsuits came out of one household over one kind of claim, and I know I keep circling back to when the first one happened.
Before you go — one thing, and I'm sorry, I already made you sit through this once tonight, but it's the last time I'll say it. Both lawsuits — the one against the paper, and the one against his wife — are about somebody being warned before October 7th and not acting on it. Haaretz's warning is dated to that same month back in 2023. Hers turned into a lawsuit dated to the start of this month, three years later. Was there a warning worth suing over in that house, or wasn't there — because right now they're suing in both directions over the same month I already used once tonight: September.
“You get sued for saying the government had a warning before October 7th — unless you're the Prime Minister's wife, in which case you can say the exact same thing about his political opponent on live television and it's just an opinion until somebody else sues you for it. Same house, same accusation, two totally different prices for saying it out loud. That's not a coincidence, that's a family that knows exactly which direction the lawsuit needs to point.”
“Look — Haaretz is going with three unnamed foreign sources on a live national security matter, and the Prime Minister has every right to defend his name against that kind of reporting. Sara's situation is completely different — she was just sharing her honest opinion about the political opposition in a television interview, that's protected speech. Wait, and Haaretz was sharing their honest reporting in a newspaper, that's also — no, forget I said that.”
The receipts
· Netanyahu’s wife facing libel suit for accusing opposition leader of foreknowledge about Oct. 7 massacre from the morgue, 1 Sep 2026
· Headlines for August 18, 2026 from the morgue, 18 Aug 2026
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.