From§Each

Page F2From§Eachthe early evening edition — 9 September 2026

Commerce Secretary calls data center water fears 'propaganda' a day after federal panel halted one over exactly that.

“The Data Center Conundrum”, 9 September 2026 (Photo via The New York Times — the original report)

As it ran on the front

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick went on CNBC and called the entire data center water controversy 'propaganda.' I want to defend that, because it's my job, and because on the substance he is right that this isn't a crisis, it's a rounding error, it's —

Actually, hold on. Lutnick is the one who said data centers 'suck water.' Those are his words, on the same network, and I'm not walking them back. They're the record.…

…(cont) Here is what happened, in order, because order matters. The President told American communities that rejecting a data center would leave them 'backwards and poor.' That's not a threat. That's economics: the choice is real, and somebody has to say it plainly.

Then, before those towns finished deciding, the Interior Board of Land Appeals — an appellate body inside the same federal government making that offer — stayed approval of the Townsite Data Center on public land outside Boulder City, Nevada. Eighty acres. The first data center ever proposed for federal land, halted, on the record, over exactly the water and power demand the President's offer depended on nobody minding.

Then Secretary Lutnick went on CNBC and called that concern propaganda.

I can explain this. The Secretary sets policy. The panel applies law. Different documents, different desks, same eighty acres, inside the same week. I am not going to call that a coincidence. I was told not to call it a pattern either.

Days after, a Gallup number came in: Americans would rather live beside a nuclear plant than a data center, by more than twenty points. The Washington Examiner called that hysteria. I'd call it a survey. People were asked a question, and they answered it, and the margin wasn't close.

So the water usage is either invented or it's substantial enough that the government's own panel just froze eighty acres over it. The administration has argued both, one day apart, and is asking the towns still deciding which version to believe first.

“They tell you the water complaint is propaganda, then their own panel freezes a data center over the water a day later — that's not a messaging slip, that's the tell. Eighty acres of public land, stopped cold, and the guy on CNBC still gets to laugh about it on television. Somebody's paying for that water either way, and it sure isn't Lutnick.”
Sal
“Look, nobody's water is missing, it's not missing, it's being used, which is different, which is — okay it's the same, but it's essential-industry use, it's necessary use. The panel didn't rule on water, they ruled on process, they absolutely, one hundred percent ruled on the water. I need a second.”
Chip

The receipts

· Panic! At the Data Center: Americans would rather live next to a nuke than an AI facility from the morgue, 4 Sep 2026

· Trump Commerce Secretary Once Said Data Centers ‘Suck Water,’ Now Scoffs That Such Concerns Are Just ‘Propaganda’ from the morgue, 2 Sep 2026

· Out-of-Touch Trump Says Communities That Reject AI Data Centers Will Be 'Backwards and Poor' from the morgue, 31 Aug 2026

· Federal Panel Halts What Would Be First Data Center on Public Lands from the morgue, 1 Sep 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.