From§Each

Page A2From§Eachthe midnight edition — 11 September 2026

Missouri election chief held in contempt over map flipped three times in a week, cleared hours later.

“The Supreme Court Blocks Missouri’s Voting Map, Again”, 10 September 2026 (Photo via The New York Times — the original report)

As it ran on the front

Here is the official position, and I want to be precise about it: Missouri's Secretary of State follows the ruling. Not a ruling — the ruling, singular, controlling, current. That was true Thursday morning. It was true Thursday afternoon too, technically, if you allow that "the ruling" changed twice in one day.

Start with the map. It's new this year, it was used in the August primary, and depending on which court you ask, it is worth Republicans one more U.S. House seat. On September 3rd, Missouri's own Supreme Court struck it down, unanimously, and sent the state back to its old post-2020 lines pending a vote of the people. The President said the court had "ridiculously ruled in favor" of blocking it. By September 5th the state's own attorney general was in front of the U.S. Supreme Court calling the block a "federal-election-administration disaster" and asking that the new map be put back in.…

…(cont) On September 8th, the U.S. Supreme Court said no — Justice Kavanaugh denied the request, leaving the state block standing. So the ruling, as of that morning, was: use the old map. Then, hours later that same day, a federal judge ordered the opposite — use the new map, for now. So the ruling, as of that afternoon, was the other one. We were, at all times, following the ruling. It just kept being a different ruling.

Which brings us to Thursday the 10th, when the Secretary of State's office told officials statewide to use the map the federal judge had authorized. This was, we maintained, simply following the ruling. It was also — and here's the part that's hard to say out loud — defiance of the state Supreme Court's own order, which the state Supreme Court noticed, and which is why it held the office in contempt that same day. So no. We were not following the ruling. We were following a ruling, and the wrong one, and got held in contempt for it before reversing course a few hours later and purging the charge.

Then, that same day, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the new map again anyway — the second time in a week — regardless of what the federal judge had ordered. Which means the map that was reinstated is, as of tonight, un-reinstated, and the office that got held in contempt for using it too early is now technically correct for not using it at all. We are following the ruling. We will let you know which one that is once it holds still.

“The state's top election official got held in contempt for about six hours, then un-held, and that's supposed to be accountability — it's a coffee break with paperwork. When one court says stop, another judge's already lined up to say go, and the whole scramble is over one congressional seat that decides who votes on your kid's school funding. The map doesn't need to survive in court, it just needs to survive long enough to get counted.”
Sal
“Look, the Secretary's office was simply following the ruling — the federal one, which controls, which supersedes the state one, which — no wait, the state court's the one that actually held us in contempt for that, so it must not have superseded anything. We reversed course within hours, which proves the system works, and if the Supreme Court then had to block the map anyway that's really more of a scheduling issue than a legal one.”
Chip

The receipts

Law professor breaks down Supreme Court's decision to block Missouri's new congressional map Supreme Court blocks Missouri's map drawn to favor Republicans
CBS Newsmainstream§

The Supreme Court has blocked Missouri's use of a new congressional map that would have favored Republicans ahead of the midterms. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson explains what this means.

Supreme Court blocks Missouri from using new map favoring Republicans in midterms
CBS Newsmainstream§

The Supreme Court has blocked a Missouri federal judge's order that allowed state lawmakers to use a newly-drawn congressional map for elections in November. The newly drawn map favored Republicans and likely would've given them one more seat in Congress. CBS News correspondent Ian Lee has more.

Missouri’s high court finds top election official was in contempt in legal war over redistricting Missouri's top election official defied a court order on the map — then dodged punishment by reversing course.
Washington Examinerright§

The Missouri Supreme Court found Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins in contempt on Thursday for telling officials to use a new congressional map for the November election, but that Hoskins had “purged” himself of the contempt by reversing course later in the day. The contempt finding stemmed from a weeklong legal war over whether…

· Missouri asks Supreme Court to overturn block of new congressional map before election from the morgue, 5 Sep 2026

· Missouri asks Supreme Court to restore GOP-friendly congressional map from the morgue, 5 Sep 2026

· Supreme Court denies bid to reinstate new congressional map in Missouri from the morgue, 8 Sep 2026

· Supreme Court rebuffs Missouri's request for new House map favoring Republicans from the morgue, 8 Sep 2026

· Trump: Missouri Supreme Court 'ridiculously ruled in favor' of blocking redistricting plan from the morgue, 4 Sep 2026

· Missouri Supreme Court forbids GOP-drawn map from appearing on ballot pending vote from the morgue, 3 Sep 2026

· House lawmaker sues to reverse Missouri Supreme Court’s ‘startling’ decision to block GOP-friendly congressional map from the morgue, 8 Sep 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front.