“Millions dropped from SNAP food assistance as funding faces September uncertainty”, 12 September 2026 (Photo via ABC News — the original report)
As it ran on the front
The ledger came across my desk this week the way ledgers do: quietly, and a little late.
Start with the participation column. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program is now enrolling fewer people than at any point in seventeen years, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, which traced the drop to the Republican budget law passed last summer. About five million fewer people are on the rolls since the law took effect. Call it a reconciliation: the law reconciled, the households did not.…
…(cont) On August 27th, the Secretary of Health and Human Services was asked about this — at a news conference on children's nutrition, no less — and said he did not believe the cuts would have "that much effect." I checked the filing twice in case I'd misread the sign. I had not. Five million people is the effect. It was filed here as a rounding error.
Two days later, on August 29th, a different department filed a different document. It went to the Department of Homeland Security's acquisition system and said the agency could spend up to two million dollars on dog-like robots for immigration enforcement — between one million and two million, the filing specified, for units that do not eat, do not attend school, and do not appear on any nutrition rolls at all.
So the household ledger reads like this, hon: the column that funds free school meals for roughly 1.5 million children is now listed as at risk, tied to the same law behind the seventeen-year low. The column that funds robotic dogs cleared, in the same reporting month, for up to two million dollars. Neither figure is disputed. Both come from filings, not from me.
I don't run the households and I don't run the agency. I run the comparison. When one office says the effect on five million people "won't have that much effect," and another office finds two million dollars for a machine, the gap isn't a mystery — it's a set of dates. August 26th. August 27th. August 29th. Three entries, one month, two very different appetites for a rounding error.
The reconciliation checks out. It just doesn't check out for the kids.
🍺
“They cut food off five million people's plates and some guy in a suit goes on TV to say it "won't have that much effect" — try telling that to a kid whose school lunch just went iffy. Same week, they find two million bucks for a robot dog. There's money, folks — it's just not for your kid's tray.”
“Look, the Secretary said "not that much effect" — that's a characterization, not a policy, and the data's still, well, actually we have the data, it's fine, it's under control. And the robot dogs are border security infrastructure, agents deserve modern equipment, two million dollars is a rounding error in a department this size — huh, that's basically what the Secretary said about the five million people. Moving on.”
SNAP funding could face a major shake-up at the end of September unless Congress passes a resolution to delay major changes included in the GOP’s One Big Beautiful Bill.