“Iran live updates: House adopts Iran war powers resolution in rebuke of Trump”, 16 September 2026 (Photo via ABC News — the original report)
As it ran on the front
I can't afford a fan belt.
That's not a complaint, that's a fact I wrote on the back of an envelope in the garage Tuesday: forty-one dollars, and I'm putting it off till payday. So when I tell you the Pentagon's own Inspector General put the price of the Iran war at $33.4 billion — that's CBS, dated the 16th, most of it munitions — I want you to sit with the fan belt a minute before we go anywhere else.…
…(cont) Same week, the Congressional Budget Office comes in with its own number. $38 billion total, they say, and two to three billion more every month from here on, going forward. That's also CBS, quoting the CBO report straight. And that Pentagon figure — the $33.4 billion — doesn't even count what the Pentagon itself says other agencies spent on top of it. Hundreds of millions more, they said. They didn't put a price on that part. They just said it happened.
Is the $33.4 billion the whole bill? Is it the $38 billion? Or is it whatever the other agencies spent that the Pentagon never priced?
Here's the word I keep coming back to. The Wall Street Journal — this is the Common Dreams write-up of it, back on September 3rd — says Secretary Hegseth is keeping what he calls a "presence" of fifty thousand troops in the region, extended into next year. Presence. Not war, not occupation, not deployment. Presence. Like a guy who shows up to the block party and never quite leaves.
Tuesday, the House voted 220 to 204 to tell the President to end the war or come back and ask Congress first. Third time the House has done that this year — that's CBS's count, and the Washington Examiner's count too, seven Republicans this time, three more than backed it the time before.
And two weeks before that vote, the Pentagon had already signed off on stretching that same "presence" into 2027. One paper says stop. One paper says 2027. Which one is still standing this morning? I'll tell you what CBS said about the last two votes just like this one: they failed to stop him. That's not my conclusion. That's their sentence.
Same Tuesday, Representative Massie was on the floor forcing a vote to impeach that Secretary — "high crimes and misdemeanors," his words, ABC's story. And the White House, that same day, said it was backing the Secretary. Both things happened Tuesday. Both things are about the same man.
I went and stood at the corner store Wednesday, the way I do, and asked the kid behind the register what he thought "presence" meant when the government uses it. He said it means whatever they need it to mean until somebody makes them stop meaning it.
Oh — before you go. One more thing. That word again. Presence. Fifty thousand troops, into 2027, and that's what they called it. My car's been sitting in the garage since June. I don't call that a presence. I call it broken, and I know down to the dollar what it costs me every day it sits there doing nothing. They've got fifty thousand people and thirty-three billion dollars sitting somewhere overseas, doing something.
They don't call that a war anymore. They call it a presence.
🍺
“Congress voted for the third time this year to make him stop, and the Pentagon had already signed off on keeping fifty thousand troops there into 2027 two weeks before that vote even happened. That's not oversight, that's theater with a roll call attached. Thirty-eight billion dollars and climbing two to three billion a month, and the one guy who actually tried to hold somebody accountable got run over the same day the White House said it was backing the Defense Secretary instead.”
“Look, seven Republicans crossing over on that resolution just shows the process working exactly the way it's supposed to — checks, balances, the House speaks its mind, the Commander in Chief listens, to the extent he's legally required to, which he isn't, so really it's more of a symbolic show of unity... and extending deployments into 2027, that's just prudent planning, that's not defiance — did I say defiance? That's not — that's not what I meant to say.”
The United States has spent $38 billion on the Iran war and will continue to spend billions monthly, according to a new report from the Congressional Budget Office. CBS News' Eleanor Watson has more.
The House on Tuesday passed a Democratic-backed war powers resolution that would limit President Trump’s military actions in Iran. The lower chamber voted 220-204 to pass the resolution, sponsored by Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.).
House Democrats successfully passed a resolution directing President Donald Trump to end the Iran war for a third time, with three new Republicans breaking with the president from the usual four. The resolution passed 220-204 with seven Republicans supporting the measure, three more than who backed the legislation in two previous votes.…
The Iran war has cost the U.S. military at least $33.4 billion — most of it on munitions — and not including hundreds of millions more spent by other agencies, the Pentagon says.
The Pentagon has failed its audit eight years running - the only major federal agency never to pass one Military Times, 19 December 2025
Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie seized the House floor Tuesday, launching a longshot bid to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth “for high crimes and misdemeanors."
The Pentagon has failed its audit eight years running - the only major federal agency never to pass one Military Times, 19 December 2025
Twenty-five years later, Republican politicians are still using 9/11 to justify war in the Middle East. And they're still lying shamelessly. During remarks outside the Pentagon on Friday commemorating the 25th anniversary of the terrorist attack, President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth portrayed their deeply unpopular…
It was the fifth time that a chamber of the Republican-controlled Congress has voted to rein in President Trump’s war powers as discontent with the conflict grows among voters.
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.