“Human rights experts: 'Reasonable grounds' to believe US committed war crimes with Iran strikes”, 17 September 2026 (Photo via The Hill — the original report)
As it ran on the front
Call the response what it was: "explosive." That's the New York Post's word for how the White House answered Thursday's United Nations report, which found "reasonable grounds" that two U.S. airstrikes inside Iran amounted to war crimes and recommended "full reparations to victims." Explosive. Forceful. The kind of pushback that reminds unelected international investigators this administration does not roll over for a committee report about — sorry — about war crimes. Two of them. That part's actually in the finding too, I should probably lead with that next time.
The UN mission doesn't specify which two strikes it means. There was a strike on a wedding party in Kuhestak, Hormozgan province, on September 2nd — at least five dead, 68 injured, two of them children — but whether that's one of the two under review, the wire copy simply doesn't say, and I'm not going to pretend it does just because the date lines up conveniently.…
…(cont) Then there's the drones. Iran says it's brought down at least two more American MQ-1 aircraft in recent days. That's on top of the F-15E shot down back in April — the one Colonel "Bravo" described surviving on 60 Minutes this month, two days evading capture before special forces pulled him out. Iran is calling that rescue account "fictional." I'd tell you the administration's response to that specific charge, except there isn't one in front of me — which is, I'll admit, a strange kind of silence to sit next to a word like "explosive."
Add it up and what you get is a war that started in February without a congressional vote, still running under eight months later, still generating incidents faster than the press shop can find synonyms for "strong." Consumers are covering $121 billion of it already — $930 a household in extra energy costs alone, per Moody's — and that's before you count what a war-crimes reparations bill might eventually run. The White House called the finding explosive. The drones, the strikes, the tab — those are the actual explosions. I don't know when those two words started describing the same war, but they do now.
🍺
“They found "reasonable grounds" this is a war crime and the White House's whole answer was one word — "explosive" — like it's a movie trailer, not two airstrikes in a country of ninety million people. Iran's downed two more drones this week on top of the one from April people are still arguing about, and the bill for the whole war is already on your energy statement — $930 a household and climbing, per Moody's. That war started in February without a vote in Congress, and the cost of it isn't up for a vote either — it just shows up.”
“Look, an "explosive" response is exactly what you want from an administration that won't be pushed around by a UN committee — it shows strength, it shows resolve, it shows... two more drones just got shot down, doesn't it. That's — that's not actually part of my talking points, forget I said that. The reparations language is aspirational, it's not like anyone's actually paying out — hang on, is somebody already paying?”
The United Nations's fact-finding mission on Iran said Thursday it found “reasonable grounds” that the U.S. military committed war crimes in two airstrikes inside Iran and accused Iran’s government of carrying out crimes against humanity against its citizens during the forceful crackdown on anti-government protests earlier this year.
A recently published economic analysis estimates that President Donald Trump’s illegal war with Iran has cost US consumers an average of $1,760 per household—including a total of $121 billion in extra spending on energy alone—since the conflict began less than 8 months ago. The war, which Trump launched without congressional…
The White House came out swinging against a United Nations-sponsored investigation that found “reasonable grounds” to conclude the US committed war crimes in Iran and should pay “full reparations to victims.”
Iran on Thursday accused the U.S. of fabricating its account of how it rescued an Air Force colonel whose F-15E fighter jet was shot down over Iran in April, calling the claims “fictional and unacceptable.” The service member, referred to by his mission call sign of Bravo, recounted his story of survival earlier this week...
U.N.-commissioned rights experts say there are "reasonable grounds" to believe the U.S. committed war crimes with strikes that killed scores of Iranian civilians.
The Pentagon has failed its audit eight years running - the only major federal agency never to pass one Military Times, 19 December 2025
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.
