“Health officials warn of measles exposure at Philadelphia International Airport”, 22 September 2026 (Photo via New York Post — the original report)
As it ran on the front
Let me start with the advice, because the advice is solid. Anyone exposed at Philadelphia International Airport should check their vaccination status and watch for symptoms. That is the statement as issued. The Health Department is how the statement identifies the agency, and I am not going to attach a jurisdiction to it that the story does not.
I am aware of the juxtaposition. Nobody handed it to me. I can read a calendar, and the calendar says that on the 28th of August, top administration health officials, working from information out of Pennsylvania described as vague, openly questioned the circumstances of two deaths the state's health authorities had attributed to measles. That is not denial. That is asking. Asking is free, asking is what a steward of public confidence does when the file is thin, and the file was thin because — because the state had already attributed the deaths, and attributed is a word that means a health authority made a determination and wrote it down. So the file was not thin. It was a determination somebody in Washington did not care for. Strike that. Did not find sufficiently detailed.…
…(cont) Then September 15. Pennsylvania confirmed two additional measles-related deaths, bringing the year to four. The fourth was reported as a teenager. And I will tell you what I told our people: a teenager is not vague information. A teenager is an age and a family in a state now in an open feud with the Secretary over whether — over the circumstances. Over the circumstances. The position did not move when the count doubled, and I have been calling that consistency, and I want to be careful here, because consistency is what you call it when the number does not change anything. Let me walk that back. The Secretary continues to raise questions.
Nationally the picture is what it is: a record-setting year, cases at a 35-year high, more deaths than any year since 1992. That is context. It is the kind of context an agency usually drops straight into a notice telling travelers to check their shots, and this notice did not require it, because the notice is about symptoms, and symptoms are the part nobody is fighting over.
So here is the line, and I stand behind it. Check your vaccination status. Watch for symptoms. The Health Department is telling you one thing this month and the Secretary is telling you another, and only one of them is trying to keep anybody from catching this. I misspoke. Only one of them is an advisory.
🍺
“Read the two sentences next to each other: the Health Department says check your shots because you may have been exposed at the airport, and the man running health for the whole country says he is not satisfied the deaths in that state happened the way the state says. You cannot run a vaccination advisory and a doubt campaign out of the same government and call the package public health. Four measles deaths in Pennsylvania this year, the fourth one a teenager, and the fight in Washington is over the paperwork.”
“Questioning is not denying — nobody denied anything, we asked about circumstances, and asking about circumstances is the job. The count went to four and our position held, which I would call consistency. Did I say that? That doesn't sound like me. Look, check your vaccination status, that's the advisory, we have never said otherwise.”
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.