Let's start with what the memo actually says, because the memo is careful. CBS News reviewed an internal Army message this week stating that some units would "possibly [be] needed in 90-120 days" for potential action around Cuba. Possibly needed. Ninety to a hundred and twenty days. Around Cuba. That is not an invasion. That is logistics. That is a building doing what buildings do, which is plan for things that might not happen, on a timeline that might not matter, involving units that might not go.
Now here is the part I have to walk through, because I said "might not" three times and I want to be honest about why that phrase is doing so much work. Nine months ago the U.S. military removed Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores from Caracas. Also logistics, also planning, also a timeline nobody outside the building was shown in advance. What came out the other end of that timeline was majority U.S. control of Venezuela's 65 billion barrels, with 35 percent of the stake sitting with the Pentagon — the position Energy Secretary Chris Wright later credited to a 30-minute military operation. Gas still hit $4.15 a gallon over Labor Day. Flores is still in a Brooklyn jail asking a judge to let her out for her heart. The talks over that oil stake didn't come with a 90-to-120-day memo either, as far as the public record shows — they came with Rubio, Miller, and Delcy Rodríguez in a room, and then they came with a stake. The paperwork was different. The building was the same. The result rhymes.…
…(cont) So when CBS says "possibly needed," you're allowed to hear that as caution. I'm telling you, on the record, that caution is the correct read of the sentence.
On September 15, at the TUC Congress in Britain, CTC leader Osnay Miguel Colina made the counterargument nobody in this building is required to answer: "Cuba is not a threat — the blockade is, and it is harming and punishing the whole of the Cuban people." He wasn't talking about troop levels. He was talking about who the last nine months were actually for. Ask who the next ninety to one hundred and twenty days are for. The memo won't say. Venezuela's didn't either, and then it did.
🍺
“You ever notice the memo always says "possibly" right up until there's a stake in the ground and somebody's name on the deed? Nine months ago it was Caracas, "possibly," and now the Pentagon owns 35 percent of the oil under it — this week it's Cuba, "possibly," 90 to 120 days, same building, same word. They're not hiding the playbook, they're just betting you won't read the last chapter before they run it again.”
“Look, "possibly needed" is not a commitment, it's contingency planning — support units, logistics, the kind of thing any responsible military reviews. This has nothing to do with Venezuela, that was a completely separate — well, it was the same 90-to-120-day language, and it did end with a 35 percent stake, but that doesn't mean — did I say "end with a stake"? That's not what I — look, the memo says "possibly." I stand by "possibly."”
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.