For years, the sprawling warehouses powering artificial intelligence have been built on Earth, consuming enormous amounts of electricity and water and running into resistance from the communities where they are located. Now, some of the technology industry’s biggest names are looking to the skies. Google, SpaceX, and a collection of…
Page F2From§Eachthe supper edition — 26 September 2026
Home county votes itself backwards and poor; industry's fix is a data center with no county at all

As it ran on the front
I did not sleep Thursday night. My wife told me to leave it in the notebook and come to bed, and I meant to, I really did, and then it was one in the morning and I was in the garage running an extension cord to a shop light, because I wanted to see something with my own hands instead of just reading about it. I couldn't leave it alone. What kept me up isn't complicated: somebody eats the electric bill for these things, and I wanted to know who.
I've got it written down, so let me read it to you instead of telling it from memory, because when I tell it from memory I improve things. Hold on. Here — August thirty-first. The president posts that the only reason a community wouldn't want a data center is if it wants to be, his words, backwards and poor.…
…(cont) Two days later, September second, I've got his own Commerce Secretary — the one on record saying data centers suck water — on record again saying the concern about that water is propaganda. Same man. Same water. Different word for it, two days apart.
Then, the fourth of September, Gallup asks the country a straight question and the country answers it straight: people would rather live next to a nuclear power plant than next to an AI data center, and not by a little — better than twenty points.
Then, the sixteenth, I've got Loudoun County — his county, the one that's supposed to know better — voting itself a one-year pause on new data centers. Backwards and poor, by his own definition, on his own street, of his own choosing.
Two days after that, the eighteenth, I've got a piece on what's actually in the water they're worried about. Forever chemicals. The kind that don't leave.
I'll be straight with the receipts I've got: I count zero of them where anybody says a satellite runs cheaper than a warehouse in Loudoun. I don't have that page. What I do have, dated today, the twenty-sixth, is Google and SpaceX and a collection of startups looking at whether the whole operation — the racks, the heat, the water, the meter — can just go up. Not fixed. Relocated. Off the grid we've been arguing about, onto no grid at all.
I keep coming back to the bill, and I apologize for it, because I already read you the water and the chemicals and the county vote, but the bill is the part that doesn't leave when you change the subject. Loudoun pays it in a rate hike. Palm Beach doesn't pay it at all — Palm Beach just posts about backwards and poor and lets Loudoun sort it out. Now the industry's found a third place to put the argument, and it's a place with no local utility, no local water table, no county board, and no vote.
Excuse me — before you go — I want to ask you the same thing one more time, from the other side, and then I'll let it rest. Down here, for as long as this has been going on, somebody's name has been on the envelope. A lineman reads a meter. A county supervisor stands for reelection in a town that just voted itself poor to keep its lights honest. Up there, none of that exists — no lineman, no meter reader, no board, nobody standing for anything. So when the data center is in orbit, when there's no house attached to the wire — whose name is on the bill?
“They spent six years telling Loudoun to shut up and take the rate hike or be "backwards and poor," and the second the county pushed back, the fix wasn't cheaper power or cleaner water — it was moving the whole operation somewhere with no county, no water table, and no vote. That's not innovation, that's dodging the bill by leaving the jurisdiction. Your lights still get more expensive down here; they just don't have to look at you while it happens.”
“Look, space-based data centers are just diversification — solar's free up there, no water use, everybody wins, and frankly the environmental groups should be thrilled we're taking their objections seriously. Is this costing ratepayers on Earth in the meantime? I mean, that's — did I say "in the meantime"? That's not a concession, forget I said that. The point is innovation solves problems, it doesn't dodge them, and if it happens to also dodge them, that's just efficient.”
Earlier in this story
- Trump's home county votes itself backwards and poor for one year By Lou · the early bird edition, 26 September 2026
The receipts
{beacon} Energy & Environment Energy & Environment The Big Story Forever chemicals could be another data center impact As AI data centers face intense public pushback over issues including their electricity and water use, another potential environmental impact is percolating: the proliferation of forever chemicals. © Spencer Platt, Getty…
· Panic! At the Data Center: Americans would rather live next to a nuke than an AI facility from the morgue, 4 Sep 2026
· Out-of-Touch Trump Says Communities That Reject AI Data Centers Will Be 'Backwards and Poor' from the morgue, 31 Aug 2026
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.