From§Each

Page T2From§Eachthe breakfast edition — 27 September 2026

Trump waves off Republican breaks with him; Cassidy, Cornyn and Massie were primaried out for theirs

“Republican who broke with Trump on immigration finds herself in competitive race: Sabato’s Crystal Ball”, 22 September 2026 (Photo via Washington Examiner — the original report)

As it ran on the front

Before questions, the sequence, because the sequence is calm and only sounds loud if you rearrange it.

Four hundred twenty-six arrests in Indiana over five days. That is the operational basis for members pushing to write the president's deportation program into permanent statute. The number proves the program works — proves the program operated, which, fine, is what a count of arrests proves, and we are comfortable resting there.…

…(cont) Second. On September 17, Representative Salazar released an advertisement shot outside the White House saying the enforcement effort had gone too far. The response from this building was measured. Senator Mullin defended the president's policy the next day, the president himself stayed with her, and by the 20th the congresswoman reported that he had been receptive. Receptive. He listened. That is not the same as agreement, and I'd ask you not to write that it was, since I'm the one who just called it measured.

Third: on September 22 a nonpartisan race-rater moved that Miami seat from likely Republican to lean Republican. Note that the rating moved after the ad, not because of the ad. I can't source causation and neither can you, and I'll stop there before the four of us get interested in what the president noticed on the 22nd.

Which brings us to Saturday, when the president amplified negative commentary about the congresswoman, drawing a rebuke from at least one Republican. This is being characterized as a turn. It is not a turn. It is engagement with criticism, which he is entitled to, and — look, the operative point in today's reporting is that he is not bothered by Republican breaks generally. He has declined to go after most of them. He has ousted three: he endorsed primary challenges against Senator Cassidy, Senator Cornyn and Representative Massie over insufficient loyalty, and all three are gone. That is a record, not a warning. A record is a warning with dates on it. Strike that.

Last. Democrats have introduced a bill to abolish the agency that ran the Indiana operation, and our editorial page has already laid out what abolishing it looks like. So the choice on the floor is the permanent version or nothing, and the members who have to cast that vote have now watched, over ten days, what happens to a colleague who asks whether 426 is a number or an argument. It is not a complicated lesson. It was not meant to be.

I'm told that last part landed like a threat. It was a schedule. Next question.

“Four hundred twenty-six people cuffed in Indiana in five days, and the only use anybody in that caucus has for the number is as a floor argument to make the whole thing permanent. One Republican said out loud it had gone too far, and inside ten days her seat got downgraded and the president was boosting attacks on her — same treatment that already took out Cassidy, Cornyn and Massie for insufficient loyalty. That's not a party debating a policy, that's a party being shown the invoice, and the people who actually pay it are in the vans.”
Sal
“Nobody turned on anybody. The president retweeted some criticism, which is speech, and I'd remind you he stuck with the congresswoman for a solid week after the ad — he was receptive, she said so herself, and the fact that three other Republicans got primaried out over loyalty is a separate file, it's a totally separate file. Did I say loyalty? That doesn't sound like me. Endorsements. He made endorsements, and they worked, which is the part I'd have led with.”
Chip

Earlier in this story

The receipts

· Florida Republican breaks with Trump, says immigration policy has ‘gone too far’ from the morgue, 17 Sep 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.