From§Each

Page A6From§Eachthe coffee break edition — 27 September 2026

AI Force still has no czar; Gates says no government beats Cold War pace on AI rules.

“Bill Gates says getting countries to agree on AI regulations will be harder than Cold War-era nuclear negotiations”, 27 September 2026 (Photo via NBC News — the original report)

As it ran on the front

I keep a finger on the line and read these in the order they were filed.

September 19. The President posts to Truth Social that he will form an "AI Force" and name a "czar" to run it. He calls the absence of federal guardrails a "hoax" and promises the industry no "decimation."…

…(cont) September 23. The Washington Examiner asks Washington to hold off handing over that force until it can stop one rogue agent. The piece notes that, as of September 22, public reporting still has not established where the office would sit, what authority it would hold, or which mission would separate it from the agencies already doing this work. Three questions, filed together, unanswered together.

September 24. Bill Gates goes on Meet the Press and says artificial intelligence is "powerful enough" to cause "a billion deaths." He asks for government safeguards. The office meant to provide them still has no address and no name on the door.

This week, two more filings land the same day.

The New York Post reports a shortlist has finally surfaced for the job — the second-ever chief of a "trillion-dollar industry in tumult," several current and former administration insiders rumored to be in the running. All together now: an industry measured in trillions, a search that took over a week just to produce names, for a seat that as of the 22nd still had no stated authority.

NBC has Gates again, telling the network that getting countries to agree on AI rules will be harder than it was during the Cold War. He is not speaking about the billion-deaths remark in the abstract. He is speaking about a coordination problem, and noting that the same government still has not solved the easier, smaller version of it: naming one person to run one office.

The office meant to staff the American side of it is still taking applications. I am not being unkind about the sequence. I am reading it in the order it was filed.

“They can rebrand the technology and open a hotline with Beijing in a week, but it takes over a week just to produce a shortlist for the guy supposed to keep it from killing people. There's a trillion dollars for the industry and no line item yet for who watches it. Gates isn't selling you anything — he's telling you the fastest arms race in history doesn't have anybody in the building.”
Sal
“You don't rush an appointment this important — you want real vetting, a deliberative process, not a name pulled out of a hat. Sure, the trillion-dollar office has sat empty since the announcement, but that's called due diligence, not — okay, "still lacking a czar" eight days in does read a little thin. Did I say that? That's not the line.”
Chip

Earlier in this story

The receipts

Trump plans to form 'AI Force,' appoint 'AI Czar' Trump dismisses AI safety concerns as a 'hoax,' plans no guardrails
The Hillmainstream§

President Trump announced plans Saturday to create an “AI Force” as well as appoint a "czar" to oversee the emerging technology's development. In a lengthy Truth Social post, Trump called the concerns surrounding a lack of federal AI guardrails a "hoax," adding he would not allow for the technology's "decimation" as its U.S.-based…

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.