From§Each

Page A2From§Eachthe late evening edition — 30 September 2026

Puppy video moves Flock's 120,000 cameras overnight; the bill to rein them in hasn't moved in weeks.

“SoCal woman’s cruel tactics exposed as police search for minivan used to crush puppy”, 1 October 2026 (Photo via New York Post — the original report)

As it ran on the front

I keep a file on how fast institutions move when something finally embarrasses them, and how slow when it doesn't. Flock Safety says its network has helped solve a million crimes; on review, that number didn't hold up. The company didn't shrink the claim — it ran an op-ed instead, defending its "philosophy" the same week the number failed.

On 3 September, Rep. Thomas Massie filed the Flock-Off Act, a bill that would cut off federal money for buying, installing, running or upgrading the company's license-plate readers and biometric cameras. It sat.…

…(cont) Eleven days later, a reporter aboard Air Force One mentioned to President Trump that police like the cameras. He said he liked them too. Four days after that, Texas froze new installations — Gov. Greg Abbott stopped the state adding more poles, while every camera already up kept running.

That left the camera count where it was and the search count climbing. On Long Island, departments ran nearly 3,000 manual searches through the database in a single month: Nassau County logged 1,112 in June, Suffolk County ran another 1,194, and the Suffolk district attorney's office added more on top of that. Nobody voted on any of it. Nobody had to.

Earlier that same stretch, in Texas, a police department had used AI to write up its report on a Flock search for a woman who'd had an abortion. The system logged the search, wrote the report, filed it. The bill meant to put anybody's permission between a camera network and a woman's medical history hadn't even been introduced yet.

This week the system found a new gear.

In Texas, the same network logged a search on a woman's medical history, and the department let AI write the report. The bill that would put oversight on either kind of search, Rep. Massie's, was filed on 3 September. It has not had a vote. Four weeks later, the network is still adding searches, still adding cameras, and still moving overnight — when the search is popular enough.

“They tell you there's no money to make Flock's cameras accountable, but there's plenty to turn its network into a manhunt the night a video goes viral. Nobody voted for that speed — the bill to slow it down has sat since September 3rd while Nassau and Suffolk ran nearly 3,000 searches in a month without asking anybody's permission. The next search that fast won't be a minivan, it'll be somebody's medical record.”
Sal
“Look, nobody's against finding the woman who hurt that puppy — that's just good policing, and if the cameras happen to work fast on a case everybody already agrees on, that's not a surveillance story, that's a success story. The Flock-Off Act never got a vote because — well, bills sit, that's just how committees work, it's not like anybody's blocking it. Did I just compare puppy justice to oversight on abortion searches? That's not — let's just say the system works when it needs to.”
Chip

Earlier in this story

The receipts

· Long Island cops ran nearly 3K manual searches through Flock database in one month: attorney from the morgue, 21 Sep 2026

· Texas Police Used AI to Write Report About Using Flock to Search for Woman Who Had Abortion from the morgue, 2 Sep 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.