ICE leads the investigation into the agent who shot him; he's the one held on an assault charge.

…(cont) October 1st. A federal judge keeps him in custody. Not for being shot. For a charge filed against him — assaulting an officer while trying to evade arrest. The report doesn't give me a date for that one. Just that it happened, and the old way of watching stopped working.

I wrote the dates down in a little notebook — not because I'm clever, because I kept losing track of what came before what. Turns out the order was the whole thing.

Here's where I get stuck. Maybe you can walk me through it, because I've been stuck on it most of the week, standing in my own driveway asking my dog, who has no opinion either way.

There's a toll plaza I go through most mornings — no gate, no ticket, just a camera and a bill that shows up later. Every so often the bill's wrong. Charges you for a trip you didn't take, a lane you didn't use. There's an office you can call to dispute it. Here's the part that gets me: the office that reviews your dispute works for the same authority that sent you the bill. Not a separate building. Not a separate boss. You make your case to the people who already decided what you owe.

So when I read that the agency investigating the shooting in Austin is the same agency whose agent pulled the trigger — the Department of Homeland Security investigating the Department of Homeland Security — is that the toll plaza, or is that something else? I genuinely don't know what to call it. I just know who's reviewing the bill.

And the man who got shot — he's the one with a charge against him now. Assaulting an officer while trying to evade arrest, the judge's order says today. It doesn't say which officer. I've got it written down somewhere — here. "An officer." Not the officer. An officer. Could be the one who fired the shot that's still in him. Could be somebody else standing nearby. The filing doesn't say, which means I can't tell you, which means that one's yours to sit with.

Alright — that's everything I had. Go on, get back to your day. Oh — hang on, one more thing, I almost let you walk out without it. The people with the lawn chairs in Scarborough used to watch ICE buildings the way you'd watch a nature show, out in the open, binoculars and birdsong. They're not doing that anymore. Which came first, do you figure — the agency getting quieter about where it operates, or the watchers deciding the open way doesn't work for them anymore?