Netanyahu's grievance on Fox News: the intelligence Israel gave Britain failed to prevent Britain's sanctions

…(cont) That's the order. I'm not saying anything about the order. I just needed it written down where I could see it.

Now, I wrote something else down here — hold on, it's in the coat, the other pocket — here. The New York Times: British officials have said they believe Iran played a part in planning the incident at R.A.F. Fairford. And the Washington Examiner, same day, says the intelligence was "implied to be related" to Fairford. Implied by whom, the page doesn't say. Does any of these pages give the date the intelligence arrived? Does any of them give the office in London that took it? I keep turning them over looking for it. Maybe I've got the wrong page.

Here's where I get stuck, and it's got nothing to do with any of this, so forgive me.

My car needs a fan belt. It's needed one since June, which is when my wife told me it needed one. Last winter I told my brother-in-law his back tire looked soft. Two weeks later he's sitting on the shoulder of the parkway with his flashers going. When he came by the porch after, I said: I told you about that tire. He said, you did, you told me. And then I asked him for twenty dollars toward the fan belt. He said no.

Now. He said no shortly after I brought up the tire. So I want to ask about one phrase, because it's the phrase in the receipt and not mine. Shortly after. Does shortly after mean because of? If a man helps you on a Tuesday and you turn him down on a Thursday, which of those two is the Thursday about? And here's the part I couldn't answer standing on my own porch, with the dog looking at me: did I ever once, before that tire went flat, ask my brother-in-law to put it in writing that I'd warned him? Because now the only paper on it is me, saying so.

That's my trouble with a tip. A tip either has a page with a date on it, or it has a man describing it on television. Is the Fox News interview the page? Is there anything in these receipts that tells me which day the intelligence came in, or which day the sanctions were decided? Six arrests are in here. The Explosives Act is in here. Eighty-five households walked out of their homes in the dark is in here. What's in here for the tip, besides the telling of it?

Oh — I'm sorry. You've got your coat on. One more thing and then I'm out of your hair, because it's in this pocket and I only just found it, folded up with a ticket stub.

September 8. The president of the United Arab Emirates told this same Prime Minister that the Hamas leader in Gaza was planning an operation — ten days before October 7, 2023, according to Haaretz. September 9: he sent the paper a warning letter saying he would sue for libel over it. Haaretz says it stands by its reporting.

So on the page where the warning goes out, there's a government that got sanctioned anyway. On the page where the warning comes in, there's a newspaper that got a lawyer's letter. Both pages are from the same month, and the same man is on both of them. Does either one tell me what a warning is worth?