From§Each

Page A2From§Eachthe breakfast edition — 2 October 2026

El-Sayed apologizes to Jewish Democrats in person, pressed five weeks later to condemn Iran's regime again.

“'DSA jihadi': LA mayoral candidate torched after defending 'genocide' comment during Jewish forum”, 2 October 2026 (Photo via Fox News — the original report)

As it ran on the front

You know the toll plaza on 94, the one with the orange sensor that's supposed to read your transponder and wave you through? I go through there most Tuesdays, same car, same lane, same little beep. Three weeks back the beep didn't come — no wave, nothing — so I drove through anyway, because what's a man supposed to do, back up on the highway? Fine. Two weeks after that, a letter. Unpaid toll, a dollar sixty-five, due immediately. So I go to the counter — not the phone, the counter, because I like to watch a person's face when they tell me I owe money I already paid — and I've got the bank statement folded up right there showing the dollar sixty-five came out the same day I drove through. The woman looks at it, looks at her screen, says the two systems don't talk. The toll was paid. The letter went out anyway. Nobody told the letter.

I bring this up because I was reading two things this week that put me back at that counter, and I wrote the dates down on the back of an insurance card I keep in the glovebox, on account of I couldn't find anything else with a blank side to it.…

…(cont) Did Abdul El-Sayed stand up in front of the Michigan Democratic Jewish Caucus on Saturday, August 30th, and say, in his own words, "I made a mistake"? That's what The Hill had it as. Did the Washington Examiner, writing the very next day, describe that same appearance as him trying to build a bridge with Michigan's Jewish community over something he'd said after the attack on a Detroit-area synagogue? I believe it did. Both dates are on the insurance card.

So then why, twenty-six days later, on September 25th, did the New York Post run a piece asking why Mr. El-Sayed "refuses to condemn Iran's Revolutionary Guard thugs" — like the 30th never happened? And why, this week, on October 2nd, did The Federalist run very nearly the same question, a writer saying El-Sayed wouldn't condemn "the Islamic terror regime that persecuted my family members" — is that a new toll, or the old one, stamped a second time? I only ask because I've got August 30th written down, and I keep checking it against the other two, and the apology's still there. Nobody crossed it off.

The same week, a different driver got a letter at a different address. Out in Los Angeles, Fox News ran a piece calling Nithya Raman, who's running for mayor, a "DSA jihadi," on account of she defended calling what's happening in Gaza a genocide and said she backs the boycott movement, at a Jewish community forum, no less — same kind of forum El-Sayed stood up at. Is that the same system that doesn't talk to the other system? I don't have Ms. Raman's bank statement. I only have mine, and El-Sayed's, which is the only one with a payment already posted.

My car barely starts most mornings — I've been putting off the fan belt — and standing at that toll counter I had time to think, waiting on the woman to find the right screen. And look, excuse me, before you go — one more thing's been bothering me since the counter, and I'd be lying if I said it wasn't. If a man stands in a room on August 30th and says, "I made a mistake," and two different papers print it, with the date on it, is that apology still good on September 25th? Is it still good on October 2nd? And if it is — if it's sitting right there in two separate files, same as my bank statement was sitting right there in my pocket — who exactly is supposed to be the one who tells the toll plaza it's already been paid?

“They're not fact-checking him, they're re-billing him — he apologized in person back in August, on the record, twice over, and five weeks later two different outlets print the same question like it's new. Same week they slap "jihadi" on a woman in LA for saying the word genocide out loud at a synagogue forum. This isn't about who's sorry, it's about who gets to stay sorry once the vote's close.”
Sal
“Look, an apology for one remark doesn't retire the whole subject — if a candidate can't say plainly that he condemns a regime that, sure, killed the man's family, that's a fair follow-up question, every outlet's entitled to ask it twice, three times, as many times as — okay, that's starting to sound like a pile-on. Did I say pile-on? That's not the word I meant.”
Chip

Earlier in this story

The receipts

· Why Abdul El-Sayed refuses to condemn Iran’s Revolutionary Guard thugs from the morgue, 25 Sep 2026

· El-Sayed apologizes to Jewish Democrats for synagogue attack comment from the morgue, 30 Aug 2026

· El Sayed tries to build bridge with Jewish community with Temple Israel apology from the morgue, 31 Aug 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.