Trump has already spent $2.5 million running these ads, of your taxpayer dollars. Before he’s done, he’s planning to spend at least 20 million on them.
Page F2From§Eachthe coffee break edition — 2 October 2026
Democrats guessed 'up to $20 million'; the White House's own plan starts at $20 million.

As it ran on the front
On September 25 the White House filed its description, not an appropriation, for a new ad: "patriotism isn't partisan." The spot itself — Air Force One, a stadium crowd, Trump at rallies and alongside military personnel — was already running that week on Fox, Newsmax and CBS, and critics called it, more than once, self-aggrandizing propaganda. A legal expert went on the air the same week to explain how the Hatch Act could apply to spending exactly like it. And a watchdog, running the money forward instead of back, found Trump's stated control over a $400 million political fund at MAGA Inc. sitting under the ad buy — control the watchdog called, on its own, a clear-cut violation of campaign finance law.
By September 29 the file had a second column. Senate Republicans, who generally approve of Trump's message — one spot in rotation pledges to "cast out the communists, Marxists and fascists" — told him in public not to pay for it with public money. Public Citizen filed two complaints that week, one asking broadcasters to stop airing the spots, one asking regulators to open an investigation. Congressional Democrats put their own number on the file: up to $20 million, drawn, by the Wall Street Journal's sourcing, from Department of Homeland Security funds, with Customs and Border Protection named as the account. Some called the whole arrangement an impeachable offense.…
…(cont) Three days later The Hill supplies the other side of that same number. The administration has already spent $2.5 million. Before it stops, it plans to spend at least $20 million. That is not a rebuttal to the Democrats' "up to" figure — it is the floor underneath it.
What has not moved since September 25: no statute enforced, no fund frozen, no ad pulled. The Hatch Act question a legal expert raised that week is still a question. The $400 million watchdogs called a clear-cut violation sits exactly where it sat. Public Citizen's complaints, filed September 29, are still complaints, with no ruling attached to either one. The gap here is not between the estimate and the spend — those match, to the dollar. It is between the law on the books and the law anyone in Washington has actually used.
“This is the oldest trick at the bar: take the public's own tax money and use it to buy the ads asking the public to keep you in charge, then call $20 million of it patriotism. Senate Republicans who like the message still saw the invoice, and not one dollar of it has been clawed back. The law's sitting right there; nobody's picked it up.”
“Look, 'patriotism isn't partisan' is the official line, and if a stadium montage reminds voters the government exists, that's public service, not a campaign ad. The Hatch Act stuff — sure, some senators want it labeled different, that's a paperwork question, not — okay, it's twenty million dollars of paperwork, I hear it.”
Earlier in this story
- Trump's $400 million PAC pays for ads the White House insists are patriotism, not partisan. By Ruth · the milkman edition, 2 October 2026
The receipts
Chris Lehmann But as brazen and authoritarian as these ad spots are, they seem likely to backfire. The post Trump Is Using Your Taxpayer Money to Pay for Illegal Election Propaganda appeared first on The Nation .
· Impeachment Calls Grow as Dems Say Up to $20 Million in Taxpayer Funds Were Used for 'Illegal' Pro-Trump Ads from the morgue, 29 Sep 2026
· Complaint Demands Broadcasters Stop Airing Trump's Illegal Taxpayer-Funded Ads from the morgue, 29 Sep 2026
· 'Pure Cult Propaganda': Outrage Grows Over 'Illegal' Taxpayer-Funded Ad of Trump Begging for Your Love from the morgue, 25 Sep 2026
· GOP senators push back on Trump’s taxpayer-funded ad from the morgue, 29 Sep 2026
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.