Protect College Sports Act protects sports by ending Mark Mitchell's fifth season days after passage.

Trudyher side

The location was Knoxville, not Austin — the New York Post reported the President cheered at a University of Tennessee game, the flyover before kickoff, Texas visiting, not Oklahoma.

Advanced, not passed — The Hill's own copy: the Senate only advanced it that Tuesday, with a five-year eligibility window, not a limitations clock, and antitrust protection for the NCAA built right in.

Unanimous it was not — The Hill calls it a sweeping bipartisan vote, no lopsided-history tally attached, and sweeping still falls shy of unanimous.

Kentucky, not Texas — CBS Sports, Friday: the Kentucky Court of Appeals dissolved it, and Mitchell's hardly alone; the same ruling left several other fifth-year players in the identical limbo.

Nobody asked for a blessing, sugar — the fifth year exists because that eligibility window is exactly what the Senate wrote into this bill two weeks before a Kentucky court took it back.

Desk's full, and you don't get to grandstand out of a correction — but you're not wrong on the receipt: The Hill, September 15, says the same bill protecting athletes also shields the NCAA from antitrust suits, and only one of those two protections survived Friday in Kentucky. Go lie down, and eat your mushrooms before next week's column — your memory's worse than the bill's follow-through.