President Trump’s selection of four administration officials to head up his new “Super Intelligence Force” is offering a window into how the White House will approach AI in the face of pressure over its risks. The group of government leaders each reflect different priorities of the Trump administration after months of mixed messaging on…
Page A3From§Eachthe breakfast edition — 7 October 2026
THE ACCORD
Trump renames artificial intelligence 'super intelligence,' then appoints four officials to run the force named for it.
As it ran on the front
Pull the document. Not a leak, not a summary — the actual text, titled the "White House Accord on Super Intelligence Joint Commitment on Frontier Responsibilities," released by the White House on September 29. Read the title again — all together now — the technology it governs is called, throughout, "super intelligence." A week earlier, on September 22, the President had told the UN General Assembly that artificial intelligence would be renamed: "hereinafter called super intelligence. Changing the name." The Accord simply inherits the new name and gets to work.
The agreement does not explain what distinguishes "super intelligence" from the artificial intelligence it replaces on paper. It does not attempt to. The filing is the rename, formalized.…
…(cont) Five days after the Accord, on October 4, Trump named Director of National Intelligence Jay Clayton to run the enforcement side of it: the "Super Intelligence Force." The four officials inherit an agency named for a word the President coined at the UN about two weeks before the agency had a staff.
What the Accord does not do, the record is just as direct about. It does not require the companies to slow what they are building, stop what they are building, or report anything beyond what they volunteer. The mixed messaging The Hill flagged is the one honest paragraph in the whole file: the administration could not agree on what the risk is, so it agreed, instead, on what to call it.
That's the filing. The paragraph with the new name is one clause. The four officials reading from it are the next one, and the agency they run has no older name to go back to.
“They didn't regulate the technology, they renamed it, then built a federal Force to guard the new name. That's not oversight — that's find-and-replace with a badge and a budget line. The actual machine, the one making the actual decisions, walks out of this paperwork wearing a different label and the same leash it always had, which is none.”
“Renaming it "super intelligence" shows this White House is finally giving the technology a name worthy of the moment — leadership, basically. And letting the companies write their own frontier-model guidelines, that's just efficiency, the people who understand it best regulating it best. Did I say "regulating"? I meant volunteering. Scratch that.”
The receipts
· Trump announces ‘Super Intelligence Force’ led by DNI Jay Clayton from the morgue, 4 Oct 2026
· READ IN FULL: Trump and tech leaders’ White House Accord on Super Intelligence from the morgue, 29 Sep 2026
· Trump says AI will be renamed 'super intelligence' in all US documents from the morgue, 22 Sep 2026
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.