The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to review a requirement that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) turn over internal communications in ongoing litigation, which the Trump administration calls an “intrusive” demand that violates the separation of powers. The high court previously issued a ruling siding with the…
Page B41From§Eachthe morning edition — 13 October 2026
Agency built to cut government waste fights to the Supreme Court to keep its own paperwork secret.

As it ran on the front
The Supreme Court said Tuesday it will decide whether an agency built to total up everyone else's paperwork has to produce some of its own. Case name: U.S. DOGE Service v. U.S. District Court. All together now — the FOIA request.
The request itself is not complicated. A nonprofit watchdog group sued the Department of Government Efficiency, asserting, as the New York Times reported it, that DOGE should be subject to federal Freedom of Information Act requests like any other agency. That is the entire ask. Not classified cables. Not nuclear codes. Internal communications, from an office that, per NBC, played a key role in firing thousands of federal workers and canceling government funding streams.…
…(cont) DOGE's answer was to go to court. This dispute has been to the Supreme Court once already: the administration sought emergency relief, and the Court sided with it. Now DOGE is back, asking the Justices to settle the underlying question for good — whether handing over internal documents is, as the Hill reports the administration's lawyers arguing, an "intrusive" demand that violates the separation of powers. The Washington Examiner reports the same claim: the request intrudes on separation-of-powers protections.
Separation of powers describes the relationship between Congress, the courts, and the executive. It does not, in the ordinary reading, describe the relationship between a records request and the agency that received it. But that is the argument now sitting before nine people in robes, because a watchdog group kept asking and DOGE kept saying no, all the way up.
All together now — the FOIA request. It asks the same thing in October that it asked the day it was filed: tell us what the efficiency office did. The agency whose entire name promises to find the fat in other people's budgets has spent its own time, and now the Supreme Court's, arguing that the one place its efficiency does not reach is the paperwork about itself. The Court has agreed to hear it. The watchdog is still waiting on the documents.
“They named it Government Efficiency and the first big thing it's efficient at is burning years of court time so nobody sees its own paperwork. Fire the workers, cancel the funding, then lawyer up all the way to the Supreme Court when somebody asks for the receipts. That's not a budget office, that's a vault with a press release stapled to it.”
“This isn't about hiding anything, it's about protecting the executive branch from being micromanaged by outside groups with subpoena power — separation of powers, plain and simple. The agency isn't refusing to answer, it's just arguing it shouldn't have to answer the way every other agency does. Did I just say that out loud? That's not — that's not the talking point.”
Earlier in this story
- Altman said accept some "bad things." Sanders asked which ones. The IMF named one this week. By The Wrecking Crew · the evening edition, 13 October 2026
- Washington backed the Saudi offensive nine days ago; the White House is now weighing whether to join it. By Lou · the evening edition, 13 October 2026
- White House weighs joining a war Delta already decided was too dangerous to fly into. By Lou · the evening edition, 12 October 2026
- U.S. backs Saudi offensive in writing Oct. 4, now weighs joining the war it already backed. By Lou · the morning edition, 12 October 2026
- U.S. backs Saudi war before airport deaths, which arrive afterward exactly as scheduled By Mort · the evening edition, 11 October 2026
- Trump said Houthis agreed not to fight the US, weighs joining the war after they killed an American. By Lou · the morning edition, 11 October 2026
The receipts
The Supreme Court announced Tuesday that it will hear a lawsuit over a left-wing watchdog’s attempt to obtain the Department of Government Efficiency’s internal documents through a Freedom of Information Act request, which the Trump administration claims intrudes on separation-of-powers protections. The high court granted review of U.S.…
The Supreme Court allowed a watchdog group to seek further information about the internal operations of the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency that played a key role in firing thousands of federal workers and canceling various streams of government funding.
The Supreme Court agreed to take up a dispute involving a government watchdog group's attempt to get information from the Department of Government Efficiency.
A nonprofit watchdog group sued the Department of Government Efficiency, asserting that it should be subject to federal Freedom of Information Act discovery requests.
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.