From§Each

Page A222From§Eachthe afternoon edition — 25 October 2026

THE THIRD EXCUSE

Musk confesses to the blackout he blamed on Washington, Pentagon rewards him with more satellite tracking data

“Musk confirms SpaceX was behind thwarting of Ukraine’s Starlink access: ‘Evil warmongers’”, 25 October 2026 (Photo via New York Post — the original report)

As it ran on the front

After Volodymyr Zelensky called on him to restore Starshield, the Pentagon-funded version of Starlink, Musk said any limit on it "would be due to decisions made by the US government." The next day, he said Zelensky should "go."

On October 20, the Wall Street Journal reported, through The Hill, that the decision Musk had pointed at Washington was his own order, and that it had hobbled Ukraine's drones, airplanes, and helicopters. The same day, War Secretary Pete Hegseth offered the Pentagon's own account: a possible violation of Starshield's "terms of service," the Washington Examiner reported. A second excuse, now aimed at Ukraine, with no name attached to defend it under oath.…

…(cont) On October 21, Senate Democrats asked for that oath. Senator Adam Schiff framed the choice as binary: "Either the President was lying or Musk was lying, but the decision to slow down satellite speed and access has life or death consequences for Ukraine." The Senate can compel testimony with a subpoena. It asked instead.

It asked again four days later. On October 25, three things landed in the same stretch: the excuses collapsed into a third, Schiff renewed his ask, and the Pentagon widened the contractor's access. Musk confirmed, in his own name, that he had ordered the throttle, writing that Starlink had been used "for offensive drone strikes to kill people" and calling the country that used it "evil warmongers" — a characterization Kyiv denies. In a separate item that Saturday, the Daily Caller ran Musk's other line for Kyiv: "May you burn in hell." The same day, Schiff said Hegseth should testify on the slowdown, NBC News reported — the second ask in four days, still without a subpoena attached. And The Guardian reported that the Pentagon had handed SpaceX access to restricted space-tracking data, the kind that gives one company a hand on traffic control in Earth's orbit.

The contractor who spent twelve days deciding whose fault the blackout was gets a bigger set of keys while the committee that could compel him to explain it keeps asking nicely. The subpoena is still in the drawer. So is the explanation.

“They're not investigating the man, they're deputizing him. He told you three different stories about why your ally's drones went dark, and the prize for story number three was a bigger Pentagon contract. That's not an inquiry, that's a bonus structure with a hearing invite stapled to the top he's still free to skip.”
Sal
“Look, the terms of service are clear, Starlink's a civilian system, you can't use civilian infrastructure for strikes, that's just — that's a contract issue, that's not a — okay the tracking-data contract, that's completely separate, that's just normal Pentagon business. Why would I connect those? Did I say they were connected?”
Chip

Earlier in this story

The receipts

US military gives Elon Musk’s SpaceX access to sensitive tracking data
The Guardianmainstream§

This gives the company an advantage in tracking objects in orbit, raising national security concerns and fears of greater control over the space industry The US military has given Elon Musk’s SpaceX access to restricted space tracking data, raising a new round of questions about whether the Trump administration is attempting to hand over…

· Musk ordered Starlink slowdown in Ukraine: WSJ from the morgue, 20 Oct 2026

· Democrats call for investigation into Musk over reported Starlink slowdown order from the morgue, 21 Oct 2026

· Hegseth points to Starshield ‘terms of service’ in Ukraine speed cap dispute from the morgue, 20 Oct 2026

· Musk says Zelensky should 'go' as doubts grow over US support for Ukraine from the morgue, 14 Oct 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.