“DOJ issues grand jury subpoenas to election officials in California”, 30 October 2026 (Photo via ABC News — the original report)
As it ran on the front
You're sharp people, so I'll just say it: a smart operation doesn't make the mistake that's sitting on page nine today, the one where twenty thousand names went from a civil list to a grand jury in a single day.
I write things down the way I do everything else, which is badly, on the backs of other things — this one's on an envelope that's also got the dog's next vaccination date on it, so forgive the handwriting. Back on September 15th, somebody inside the effort to find noncitizens on the voter rolls told a reporter the whole project might be breaking state law, might be catching citizens who had every right to be on that roll. A whistleblower, the piece called them. I wrote down the date and the word "whistleblower" and moved on, because that's what you do with September.…
…(cont) Two weeks after that, October 1st, I read that the people whose actual job was chasing foreign interference and domestic threats to the vote — that effort got closed down. Not reassigned anywhere I can find in what I've got, just closed, the same month the noncitizen project was getting all the attention instead. So here's a question I keep circling back to, and I apologize for it: how many investigators does that foreign-interference unit still have, the one that shut down October 1st? I don't have the number. I don't think anybody's printed it.
October 9th, a federal judge said no to the method — the collecting of state voter rolls the way the department was doing it. October 22nd, a federal judge said no again, to a related piece of the same effort, and the order itself described what it was chasing, noncitizen voting, as vanishingly rare to begin with. I don't know if that's the same judge from the 9th or a different one — I don't have a name on this page, so I won't guess.
Same week, the secretary of state up in Washington State put out a statement calling the department's list "profoundly disappointing," on account of the errors their own office found just checking it. I wrote that phrase down because I liked it, and because I don't get to use "profoundly disappointing" about my own work without somebody taking it personally.
Monday the 26th, the president posted that anybody who reports voter fraud, past elections or the one coming up, gets a million dollars, paid out once there's an arrest and a conviction. I wrote the number down. A million dollars is real. A conviction is a thing that has to happen first.
I wrote the question down word for word. I haven't found the answer anywhere in what I've got.
And the very next day, the department didn't answer it. It sent grand jury subpoenas to the same election officials, over the same list, which means the civil demand a judge had just finished doubting got promoted overnight into a criminal one.
I'll tell you what I do when the reader at the toll plaza flags my car for a plate that isn't mine. I don't go argue with the reader. I go find out whose plate it actually is before anybody gets a bill. I don't know if that's how it works over there.
Actually — hold on, one more thing before you go. Of the people on that list, the ones the department is now investigating criminally instead of civilly, how many have been charged with anything — out of the twenty thousand?
🍺
“They didn't answer the judge's question about how they built that suspect list — they just pointed a grand jury at the same officials who wouldn't go along with it. That's not an investigation, that's a bill for refusing to flag twenty thousand ballots nobody's proven belong to noncitizens. Five days out from an election, that's the message, and it's aimed at anybody still counting votes the department doesn't like.”
“Look, prosecutors follow the evidence, that's all this is, a civil matter that just happened to need a grand jury — twenty thousand questionable registrations is twenty thousand too many to ignore. And a judge asking how they identified suspects doesn't mean the identification was wrong, it just means — well, it means the judge wanted to know how they did it, which, okay, is usually the question you ask when something's wrong. Did I say that? Strike that.”
The DOJ disbanded its crypto enforcement team in April 2025 and ordered inconsistent investigations closed - while the president's family runs a crypto business CNBC, 8 April 2025 (Blanche memo)
DOJ issues grand jury subpoenas to local election officials in California as part of its investigation into the state’s voter rolls, multiple sources told ABC News.
The subpoenas come just a day after a federal judge called into question the process the Trump administration used to identify alleged noncitizens.
The DOJ disbanded its crypto enforcement team in April 2025 and ordered inconsistent investigations closed - while the president's family runs a crypto business CNBC, 8 April 2025 (Blanche memo)
The Department of Justice has reportedly subpoenaed California election officials who have refused to set aside mail-in ballots associated with up to 20,000 suspected noncitizens. The move comes a day after a Clinton-appointed federal judge denied the DOJ’s bid to prohibit California from counting ballots that belong to voters whose…
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.