From§Each

Page B49From§Eachthe afternoon edition — 31 October 2026

Trump's 250-foot arch for snipers and drones, built for America's 250th anniversary, draws second lawsuit this month

“DC, Virginia sue to block Trump's triumphal arch”, 31 October 2026 (Photo via The Hill — the original report)

As it ran on the front

Before I ask you anything, let me just read you the list. I wrote it all down in order, it's in the raincoat here, hold on — ah. Here it is.

April: the Commission of Fine Arts approves the arch. September 4: the Interior Secretary, Doug Burgum, announces excavation will begin. September 20: the President posts that the arch will incorporate a "top grade military complex," at the request of the U.S. military, for National Security purposes. Snipers. Drones. September 28: the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation closes its consultation with the experts and the general public. October 9: Arlington County sues. October 31, yesterday: Washington, D.C., and Virginia sue the National Park Service and the Interior Department.…

…(cont) That's the list. I didn't add anything to it. That's just the order it came in.

Now, the twenty-eighth. I want to go back to the twenty-eighth, and I'm sorry, because I assumed the first time that I'd copied it down backwards. The council's vice chairman, Travis Voyles, sent a letter saying the consultation was closing, and here's the reason given: addressing the experts' concerns and the general public's would require them to deviate from the president's vision for the project. A preservation group said it was gobsmacked. That's their word, not mine.

I keep coming back to it — sorry — because of the eight days. On the twentieth, the military asked for a change, and the President wrote that he had agreed to convert the arch. Eight days later the letter goes out explaining that changes can't be addressed.

And before either of those, on the fourth of September, an attorney named Nicolas Sansone said the administration had no legal authority to begin work on its monumental arch. The excavation announcement came that same Thursday anyway.

Here's what I can't get past, and it's small. My car's been going to the same garage for eleven years, fan belt, always the fan belt. Last time the kid hands me a clipboard at the counter, and the clipboard says, tell us anything else you've noticed. So I notice. I write down the shimmy at forty, I write down the wiper. He reads it, he hands the clipboard back to me, and he says he can't put those on the ticket, because the ticket's already approved and anything I noticed would change the ticket. Then he asks me to initial the bottom. I'm still paying for the clipboard, is my point. I paid a man to ask me.

I apologize, I'm on the twenty-eighth again. Somebody typed that letter. Somebody printed it, somebody signed it, somebody carried it down a hallway to go out. That's a person walking a piece of paper across a room to tell the experts that the review they were in the middle of had reached the one answer it wasn't allowed to reach.

Then October 9. Arlington County sues over a 250-foot arch, citing tourism and the safety of local residents. Two hundred fifty feet, for the 250th anniversary of the country, planted between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery. The people buried there don't get a comment period either, but nobody closed theirs on a Monday.

Which brings us to yesterday. D.C. and Virginia, in federal court, against the Park Service and Interior, arguing the thing should have required congressional approval and that its height is a problem. That's the second suit this month. The consultation cost somebody nothing to shut. The lawsuits cost two states and a county their lawyers.

Excuse me — before you go, you've got your hand on the door. Just one thing. Two requests landed in September. The military's, on the twentieth, which got the arch changed. The public's, which was still open on the twenty-eighth. So which of those two turned out to be the deviation from the president's vision?

“They shut the public consultation because answering the public would mean changing the drawing — that is not a review, that is a receipt for your own silence. It took Arlington County on the 9th, then D.C. and Virginia yesterday, to get a judge to look at a 250-foot arch with a military complex in it going up next to Arlington National Cemetery. They tell you there's no money and no time for your concerns; there's money, it's going into snipers and drones on a monument to a birthday.”
Sal
“The Commission of Fine Arts cleared this back in April, so the review happened, and the consultation closed because it had run its course, not because — did I say that? That doesn't sound like me. The military requested the security features themselves, for National Security purposes, and frankly two lawsuits in a month is how you can tell a project is significant.”
Chip

Earlier in this story

The receipts

The White House ballroom was announced at $200 million and now costs $400 million; the East Wing was demolished for it Fortune, 6 April 2026

DC, Virginia sue to block Trump's triumphal arch
The Hillmainstream§

Washington, D.C., and Virginia sued the National Parks Service and Interior Department to block President Trump’s proposed triumphal arch on Saturday, a new court filing shows. The planned arch would resemble arches in other cities, including Paris’s Arc de Triomphe, and be constructed on the border between D.C. and Virginia.

The White House ballroom was announced at $200 million and now costs $400 million; the East Wing was demolished for it Fortune, 6 April 2026

DC and Virginia sue to block Trump’s Triumphal Arch in latest legal challenge
Washington Examinerright§

Washington, D.C., and Virginia on Saturday sued to block President Donald Trump from building the White House’s proposed Triumphal Arch. The arch, planned between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery, has faced intense opposition from critics on the basis of concerns that it should require congressional approval, and…

· Trump’s Triumphal Arch faces new lawsuit from Arlington County from the morgue, 9 Oct 2026

· 'No Legal Basis' to Begin Excavation for Trump 'Vanity Arch' in DC, Say Critics from the morgue, 4 Sep 2026

· Arlington County sues to block Trump arch after project gets key approval from the morgue, 9 Oct 2026

· Preservation Group 'Gobsmacked' as Trump Admin Dismisses Public Concern Over Triumphal Arch from the morgue, 28 Sep 2026

· Trump says triumphal arch to be used for snipers, drones from the morgue, 20 Sep 2026

This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.