Garcia is poised to be the next chair of the House Oversight Committee, which has subpoenaed Black as part of its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.
Page A228From§Eachthe evening edition — 5 November 2026
THE CONTEMPT FILE
Billionaire held in contempt over Epstein ties sues incoming oversight chair for $7.25 million over repeating it

As it ran on the front
I've got The Hill's wire story from September sixteenth right here — or I had it, just give me a second, I think it slid under the passenger seat with the oil change reminder cards I keep forgetting to toss — and there's a word in it that shows up twice. "Unanimous." The House passed the contempt referral to the Department of Justice by unanimous consent. Same story, next sentence: the House Oversight Committee had already agreed to hold Mr. Black in contempt — unanimously. Two separate unanimous findings, one afternoon, one man. I don't know why that's the part I keep circling, sir, I really don't, but there it is, twice, like somebody wanted it on the record both ways. How many unanimous votes does it take to settle one contempt?
I'm sorry, I have to go back to this, from a different angle. Thirteen days before that vote — September third — Mr. Black was scheduled to sit for a deposition in front of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. That same day, instead, he filed a lawsuit of his own, trying to stop the subpoena before the deposition could happen. The committee asked a question. What came back, the same day, was a filing. I wrote "same day" down and underlined it twice, and I apologize, because I keep coming back to the underline, not the filing. Did that lawsuit answer the subpoena, or stop it?…
…(cont) And I'm sorry again, but there's a third side to this I can't let go of, and it's the money. Seven million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars. That's the figure in the lawsuit Mr. Black filed this week, fifty days after that contempt vote, against Congressman Robert Garcia, the ranking member on that same committee. Seven million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars, for saying, in public, the same thing the committee already said.
I tried picturing what that number looks like carried somewhere, the way I carry the grocery bags from the trunk to the porch two at a time because my knees won't do it in one trip anymore. Seven million, two hundred fifty thousand one-dollar bills would take a pallet, not a trunk. I don't have a use for that picture, sir, I just needed it to hold the number still long enough to write it down properly.
I'm sorry, one more pass, because the part I keep losing isn't the money or the date, it's the chair. Congressman Garcia isn't only the man Mr. Black is suing. The same Oversight Committee that subpoenaed Mr. Black is the one Mr. Garcia is next in line to run. So the committee that asked the question is about to be chaired by the man being sued, for seven million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars, for repeating the answer it already got.
Oh — before you go, sir, one thing, I almost let you out the door without it. If Mr. Garcia takes that gavel while this suit is still open, who exactly decides whether that committee ever subpoenas Mr. Black again — the committee that voted, unanimously, twice, or the man currently suing its next chairman for seven million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars, for saying, in public, the same thing the committee already said?
“Garcia didn't invent anything — he read the committee's own contempt finding back to the room, and the guy who got held in contempt for refusing to answer is now suing him for seven million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars for saying it out loud. That's not a defamation suit, that's a bill for quoting the public record. The next time Congress tries to hold anybody accountable, the price of repeating what you already found is apparently seven million, two hundred fifty thousand dollars, and that's the kind of math that keeps subpoenas in a drawer.”
“Look, nobody's saying a congressman can't discuss an open investigation — he just can't go around defaming a private citizen who happens to be the subject of the investigation he's about to oversee. That's not a gag order, that's basic — wait, is that a gag order? No, no, it's accountability. For him. Did I just side with the contempt guy over the committee that held him in contempt? That doesn't sound like me.”
The receipts
Billionaire Leon Black filed a $7.25 million defamation lawsuit against Rep. Robert Garcia for public comments tying him to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes.
Leon Black filed a lawsuit against Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) on Wednesday, alleging the congressman defamed him by making statements related to the billionaire’s relationship with late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Black, who helped found private equity giant Apollo Global Management, accused Garcia of making maliciously false…
· House holds Leon Black in contempt over Epstein testimony after lawsuit from the morgue, 16 Sep 2026
· House moves to hold Leon Black in contempt of Congress over Epstein interview from the morgue, 16 Sep 2026
· Committee investigating Epstein holds billionaire Leon Black in contempt of Congress from the morgue, 16 Sep 2026
· Billionaire Leon Black challenges House subpoena for Epstein testimony from the morgue, 3 Sep 2026
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.