“Reporter's Notebook: How midterms may change the House impeachment equation for Hegseth”, 6 November 2026 (Photo via Fox News — the original report)
As it ran on the front
Secretary Pete Hegseth has an answer, and it has not changed since September. He will not back down.
On September 2, Senator Thom Tillis — a former member of the Senate Armed Services Committee — stood in front of cameras and asked President Trump to fire Hegseth over what Tillis called "inept management" of the military. The next day, Frank Kendall, who ran the Air Force until last year, told CNN the Pentagon under Hegseth had gone "dysfunctional." The Secretary did not answer either man. He had better things to do. Or — he had one thing to do, and it took him two months to get around to it.…
…(cont) That thing arrived on October 29, two months after Tillis asked for his job: Hegseth fired Brett Sylvia, the Joint Staff's top planner, over an alleged leak, with roughly a fifth of the senior officer corps slated to follow him out. This is called discipline. It is actually the Secretary deciding who gets removed before anyone else gets the chance to decide it for him.
Eight days before that firing, on October 21, current and former Pentagon officials were already telling The Telegraph they were prepared to "spill their guts" to whichever chamber Democrats were about to retake. They were right about the chamber. On Thursday, November 5, two days after the midterm losses France 24 called a "setback," Hegseth released a video message. He called the Iran war "courageous and historic" and vowed to fight any effort in Congress to impeach him.
The next day, Friday, carried two items the video had not addressed. Fox News reported that Representative Thomas Massie plans to reintroduce articles of impeachment next week, with the post-midterm math now working against the Secretary. And Wes Bryant, a senior Pentagon targeting adviser and policy analyst pushed out of his job last year, told The Intercept that the strikes Hegseth ordered in the Caribbean and the Pacific are "state terrorism," that Hegseth is "100% a war criminal," that he "needs to be prosecuted."
None of that required the Secretary to back down from anything. It only required him, once, to say what, exactly, he was refusing to back down from — and he picked the one war nobody on Friday was accusing him of a crime in.
🍺
“They don't call it a cover-up anymore, they call it a video message. The guy who ran the targeting cell says the Caribbean and Pacific strikes are war crimes, and Hegseth gets on camera to defend Iran instead — like answering a burglary charge by bragging about a different house he broke into. Massie's bringing the impeachment paper back, and the only thing standing between that paper and this Secretary's job is whichever math the Senate does next.”
“Look, the Secretary addressed this head-on — he got in front of a camera and said he will not back down, that's leadership, that's answering the question, it's just not the question anyone actually asked him. He defended the Iran campaign as courageous and historic, which, fine, nobody accused him of a crime in Iran, that's not — okay, that one got away from me.”
Thomas Massie plans to reintroduce articles of impeachment against Pete Hegseth next week, and post-midterm GOP math could work against the Pentagon chief.
While President Donald Trump this week indicated he's standing by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in the wake of brutal midterm election losses, Democratic Party leaders have indicated they'll use their new majorities in Congress to remove him from office, one way or another. The Intercept reported on Thursday that source in the US…
The Pentagon has failed its audit eight years running - the only major federal agency never to pass one Military Times, 19 December 2025
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's future is in question after Tuesday's, November 3, midterms setback. On Thursday, November 5, he issued a video message vowing to fight efforts in Congress to impeach him and defending the Iran war as “courageous and historic”. FRANCE 24's International Affairs Editor Philip Turle has more.
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.