“Courts Reject Trump’s Attempt at Deploying ICE to Intimidate Voters”, 24 October 2026 (Photo via Truthout — the original report)
As it ran on the front
The lawsuit died this week in Washington, of a withdrawal its own authors filed. It was born on 24 October in Anchorage, when the Justice Department sued to block certification of Alaska's Senate race, but only if the Republican lost. The complaint named zero ballots. Four federal probes into a Democratic candidate who shared most of a Republican senator's name turned up zero charges. It is survived by its own strategy, filed anew in California; it was preceded in death, in Alaska, by the zero ballots it was built to find.
The family resemblance held. The Court's order came down ahead of the demand being met; lower courts had already ruled the same way. On Friday, the department asked the court to let it drop the case entirely.…
…(cont) Not a settlement. Not a negotiated withdrawal. Not even malarkey, really — just a request, filed by the department that filed the suit, to make its own case go away. The twenty thousand ballots the department asked California to set aside will be counted. The claim behind them — that each belonged to a noncitizen — was never tested at trial, and now it will not be. It was asserted, litigated up to the Supreme Court, lost there, and withdrawn before any court reached the merits a second time. That is the shit of it — a federal agency can put a number on twenty thousand voters, lose at the Supreme Court, and still retire the case without ever having to make its number match a name.
Alaska's version asked a state to hold a certification hostage to an outcome. California's asked a state to hold 20,000 of its own residents' ballots out of a count on the department's word alone. Both died the same way: not disproven in open court, just taken back before a judge could rule on the merits a second time. The pattern survives its own members. There is no reason, on this record, to expect it retired with California.
In lieu of flowers, the department that files these suits should publish, in every case, the list of ballots or voters the suit named — before a court has to ask, and before the suit is dropped.
🍺
“They sue to hold the count hostage, and the second the Supreme Court says no, they drop the case like it never happened — no apology, no accounting of the twenty thousand people they tried to erase. This is the same play run twice in two weeks, Alaska then California, and the only thing that changes is which state eats the legal bill. Next time it's your county's ballots on that list, and by the time a court rules, they'll have already quit and moved on to the next one.”
“Look, the department was just protecting election integrity, making sure every ballot that gets counted is a legal one — that's not political, that's the job. And dropping the case isn't losing, it's — well, the Supreme Court did rule against us, twice now, so maybe it's — did I say "us"? I meant the department. I don't work there. I just believe in the process.”
The Justice Department (DOJ) requested Friday to dismiss its lawsuit against California, which sought to make the state's election officials set aside roughly 20,000 ballots for voters the federal government alleged were not U.S. citizens. The Supreme Court already ruled against the Trump administration in an emergency order ahead of…
The DOJ disbanded its crypto enforcement team in April 2025 and ordered inconsistent investigations closed - while the president's family runs a crypto business CNBC, 8 April 2025 (Blanche memo)
The Justice Department moved to dismiss its own lawsuit that sought to stop California from counting roughly 20,000 ballots it alleged went to noncitizens.
This page is a back-issue: the story as it ran, receipts as they were. The current edition is at the front. The byline is a pen name for a column drafted by a machine and checked by the editor: how this is made.